Nwoye v. Obama
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:22-cv-01791
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Nwoye v. Obama, Judge Lehrburger denied Nwoye’s request to transfer the case because decisions had taken more than three months.
Ikemefuna Stephen Nwoye, whose request to transfer the case to another judge or division was denied; the order left his other pending matters unresolved.
What happened
In Nwoye v. Obama, Ikemefuna Stephen Nwoye asked the court to transfer his case to another judge or division because several matters had remained undecided for about three months. Those matters included his response to an order to explain why the case should not be dismissed and his request to file a second amended complaint.
The court said that motions can remain pending for more than three months, especially because of the workload in the Southern District of New York. It also said that it knew of no authority supporting transfer or recusal based on the delay described by Nwoye.
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger denied Nwoye’s application. The order did not decide the pending request to file a second amended complaint or whether the case should be dismissed.
The detailed version
- Nwoye v. Obama · No. 1:22-cv-01791
- Valerie Caproni
- May 19, 2023
Background
Ikemefuna Stephen Nwoye sued Barack Hussein Obama and Michelle Lavaughn Robinson Obama. The Second Circuit had previously vacated the District Court’s dismissal of Nwoye’s complaint for failure to state a claim because of a due-process problem. The District Court then ordered Nwoye to explain why the case should not be dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. Nwoye filed a response and asked for permission to file a second amended complaint.
On May 18, 2023, Nwoye asked that the case be transferred to another judge or division within the Southern District of New York. He based the request on the fact that the court had not yet ruled on the pending matters after approximately three months.
Court’s reasoning
The court acknowledged Nwoye’s interest in a prompt decision but explained that it is not unusual for a motion to remain undecided for more than three months. It cited the workload of federal courts and the judicial workload in the Southern District of New York. The court said Nwoye could be assured that his case was receiving appropriate attention and that the pending matters would be resolved in due course.
The court also said it was not aware of any authority supporting recusal or transfer under these circumstances and noted that requests based on dissatisfaction with the speed of decisions are routinely denied.
Disposition
The court denied Nwoye’s application at docket entry 28. The order did not rule on his request to file a second amended complaint or on whether the case should be dismissed.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.