Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 23, 2023

Jiggetts v. State of Maryland

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:17-cv-06255
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Jiggetts v. State of Maryland, Judge McMahon denied Alexander Jiggetts’s motion to seal because the transfer left this court without jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Alexander Jiggetts’s motion to seal was denied, and further submissions under the closed Southern District of New York case number will not be accepted except papers directed to the Second Circuit.

What happened

In Jiggetts v. State of Maryland, the Southern District of New York had transferred the case to the District of Maryland in August 2017. Alexander Jiggetts filed a motion to seal the action in January 2023, more than five years later.

The court explained that a court transferring a case generally loses authority over it once the case is transferred. Because Jiggetts waited more than five years to file his motion, the New York court could not decide it.

Judge McMahon denied the motion to seal for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk was directed not to accept further filings under the closed case number, except papers directed to the Second Circuit. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jiggetts v. State of Maryland · No. 1:17-cv-06255
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
May 23, 2023

Background

On August 18, 2017, the Southern District of New York transferred this action to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. On January 30, 2023, Alexander Jiggetts moved to seal the action.

Reasoning

The court held that transferring a case divests the transferor court—the court that sent the case elsewhere—of jurisdiction, meaning authority to rule on the case or related motions. The transferor court retains jurisdiction to review the transfer only if the party seeking review acts to stay the transfer before the papers are received by the clerk of the transferee court. Because Jiggetts waited more than five years to file his motion, the Southern District of New York lacked jurisdiction to consider it.

The court stated that, if Jiggetts seeks to seal the action, he must move in the District of Maryland and ask that court to transfer the action back to the Southern District of New York for consideration of the motion.

Ruling

Judge McMahon denied Jiggetts’s motion to seal for want of jurisdiction. The clerk was directed not to accept any further submissions from Jiggetts under the closed case number, except papers directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees for purposes of that appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.