Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 26, 2023

Cromitie v. Biohm Health LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:23-cv-04316
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Cromities v. Biohm Health, Judge Rochon ordered the parties to discuss settlement, consider standing, and report whether they settled.

Who this affects

Seana Cromities and Biohm Health LLC must participate in the required settlement discussions and jointly report to the court.

What happened

In Seana Cromities v. Biohm Health LLC, the court ordered the parties to begin settlement discussions within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. The opinion did not describe the underlying claims or decide whether Cromities had standing.

The parties must meet for at least one hour and discuss whether further mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge would be useful. Within 45 days after service, they must jointly tell the court whether they settled; if not, they must request mediation, a magistrate-judge settlement conference, or an initial status conference.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon entered this procedural order on May 26, 2023. The order did not resolve the parties’ legal dispute or rule on standing.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cromitie v. Biohm Health LLC · No. 1:23-cv-04316
Judge
Rochon
Date
May 26, 2023

Order

The court ordered Seana Cromities and Biohm Health LLC to meet and confer within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. They must spend at least one hour making a good-faith attempt to settle the action.

Standing Discussion

The parties must consider during their discussions whether Cromities has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning the legal requirement that a plaintiff be entitled to bring the case. The court cited Second Circuit decisions addressing standing but did not decide the standing issue in this order.

Further Settlement Proceedings and Reporting

If the parties cannot settle on their own, they must discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the court’s mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive. Within 15 additional days—45 days after service of the summons and complaint—the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either mediation or a magistrate-judge settlement conference, with a preference indicated, or an initial status conference.

Disposition

Judge Rochon entered a procedural order directing settlement discussions and a joint status report. The opinion does not resolve the underlying claims, decide standing, or state the parties’ positions on the merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.