Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 30, 2023

Hickory Capital, LLC v. SME Capital, LLC

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:22-cv-10729
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hickory Capital v. SME Capital, Judge Torres ordered the corporation to retain counsel by June 27, 2023.

Who this affects

Hickory Capital, LLC, the plaintiff corporation, was required to retain counsel and have counsel file a notice of appearance by June 27, 2023.

What happened

In Hickory Capital, LLC v. SME Capital, LLC, the court addressed the plaintiff’s lack of legal representation after its attorney withdrew.

The court noted that no new attorney had filed a notice of appearance for Hickory Capital. It reminded the plaintiff that corporations and other artificial entities cannot represent themselves in federal court.

Judge Analisa Torres ordered Hickory Capital to retain new counsel and have that attorney file a notice of appearance by June 27, 2023. She also directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to the plaintiff.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hickory Capital, LLC v. SME Capital, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-10729
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
May 30, 2023

Background

On March 14, 2023, the Court granted Hickory Capital’s attorney’s motion to withdraw and gave Hickory Capital until May 15, 2023, to retain new counsel. No attorney had filed a notice of appearance for Hickory Capital by May 30, 2023.

Legal principle

The Court reminded Hickory Capital that corporations and other artificial entities cannot proceed without an attorney in federal court.

Order

The Court ordered Hickory Capital to retain new counsel by June 27, 2023, and required that counsel to file a notice of appearance. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail a copy of the order to Hickory Capital at the address stated in the order. The order was signed by Judge Analisa Torres.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.