Thorne v. Capital Music Gear LLC
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:23-cv-00776
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Thorne v. Capital Music Gear, Judge Schofield granted Capital Music Gear’s request to pause discovery while its motion to dismiss was pending.
Braulio Thorne and Capital Music Gear, LLC; discovery and all deadlines in the case-management and scheduling order were paused or adjourned.
What happened
In Thorne v. Capital Music Gear, Capital Music Gear, LLC asked the court to pause discovery while it pursued a motion to dismiss Braulio Thorne’s amended complaint. The parties had previously agreed to pause discovery, but the court had rejected that part of their agreement.
The court ordered Thorne to oppose the motion to dismiss by June 23, 2023, and Capital Music Gear to file its reply by June 30, 2023. The court then granted the request to stay discovery and adjourned all deadlines in the case-management and scheduling order without setting new dates.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield did not decide the motion to dismiss in this order; she ruled only on the briefing schedule and the request to pause discovery.
The detailed version
- Thorne v. Capital Music Gear LLC · No. 1:23-cv-00776
- Lorna Schofield
- May 31, 2023
Background
The court’s March 22, 2023, case-management and scheduling order required the parties to complete fact discovery by July 27, 2023. On May 12, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation proposing a briefing schedule for Capital Music Gear, LLC’s anticipated motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The stipulation also stated that the parties agreed to pause discovery while the motion was pending. On May 16, 2023, the court approved the stipulation except for the proposed discovery pause, which it struck.
On May 30, 2023, Capital Music Gear filed its motion to dismiss and a separate letter motion seeking a stay of discovery. The court noted that a motion to dismiss does not automatically pause discovery and that courts generally consider the apparent strength of the motion, the scope and burden of discovery, and possible unfair prejudice when deciding whether to stay discovery.
Ruling
The court ordered Braulio Thorne to file his opposition to the motion to dismiss by June 23, 2023, and ordered Capital Music Gear to file its reply by June 30, 2023. Considering the circumstances described in Capital Music Gear’s letter and the strength of its motion, the court granted Capital Music Gear’s request for a stay of discovery. The court also ordered that all deadlines in the case-management and scheduling order were adjourned without a new date. This order did not decide the motion to dismiss itself.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.