Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 2, 2023

VistaJet US Inc. v. Wild Wonder LLC

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:20-cv-05974
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In VistaJet v. Wild Wonder, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle case without costs and without prejudice to timely restoration.

Who this affects

VistaJet US Inc. and Wild Wonder LLC; the case was closed after the reported settlement in principle, subject to a possible application to restore or reopen it within 30 days.

What happened

VistaJet US Inc. sued Wild Wonder LLC in a case that the court was told had been settled in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket within 30 days.

Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the Clerk of Court to close the case and stated that any request to reopen filed after 30 days could be denied solely because it was late.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
VistaJet US Inc. v. Wild Wonder LLC · No. 1:20-cv-05974
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
June 2, 2023

Background

The court was informed that VistaJet US Inc.’s case against Wild Wonder LLC had been settled in principle. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or describe the underlying claims.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. The court also stated that any application to reopen the action had to be filed within 30 days of the order and that a later application could be denied solely because it was filed late.

If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, they had to place the agreement’s terms on the public record and obtain the court’s approval within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.