Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 5, 2023

Crumwell v. ATC Healthcare Services, LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:23-cv-01531
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Crumwell v. ATC Healthcare Services, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by July 20, 2023.

Who this affects

Denise Crumwell, the similarly situated persons she sought to represent, and ATC Healthcare Services, LLC.

What happened

Denise Crumwell brought Crumwell v. ATC Healthcare Services, LLC on behalf of herself and other similarly situated people. She informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any request to restore the action had to be made by July 20, 2023.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Crumwell v. ATC Healthcare Services, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-01531
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
June 5, 2023

Background Denise Crumwell sued ATC Healthcare Services, LLC on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated. The opinion states that Crumwell notified the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. The court required any application to restore the action to be made by July 20, 2023. If no such application was made by that date, the court stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Effect The order ended the action on the stated conditions. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms or resolve the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.