Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 5, 2023

Victoria v. DOCCS/PASSAGE

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-04652
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil RightsSection 1983Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Alfredo Victoria v. DOCCS/PASSAGE, Judge Swain transferred the case to the Northern District of New York.

Who this affects

Alfredo Victoria’s case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Northern District of New York. The Northern District court will decide whether he may proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

Alfredo Victoria, who was incarcerated at Franklin Correctional Facility, filed this case without a lawyer under a federal civil-rights law. He alleged excessive force and unconstitutional conditions at nine New York State correctional facilities from 2000 through 2022. The only named defendant was the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision; the opinion says it was unclear what “Passage” referred to.

The court found that seven of the nine facilities were in counties within the Northern District of New York and that the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision was headquartered there. The court concluded that relevant witnesses and documents could reasonably be expected to be in that district, making it a more convenient forum.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the Clerk to transfer the case to the Northern District of New York. The Southern District of New York closed the case, directed that summonses not issue there, and left the decision about whether Victoria could proceed without paying fees to the transferee court. The court also denied fee-free status for an appeal, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Victoria v. DOCCS/PASSAGE · No. 1:23-cv-04652
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 5, 2023

Background

Alfredo Victoria filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims against state actors for violations of federal rights. He alleged that he was subjected to excessive force and other unconstitutional conditions of confinement at nine New York State correctional facilities between 2000 and 2022: Mid-State, Gouverneur, Auburn, Comstock, Clinton, Bare Hill, Franklin, Southport, and Attica. The caption named “DOCCS/PASSAGE,” but the opinion states that the only named defendant was the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and that it was unclear what “Passage” referred to.

Victoria did not name individual defendants or state where any defendant resided. He alleged only that the events occurred at the listed facilities. Seven facilities were in counties within the Northern District of New York, while Attica and Southport were in the Western District of New York. The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision was headquartered in Albany County, which is also in the Northern District.

Transfer ruling

The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which permits transfer to another federal district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The court concluded that transfer was appropriate because the alleged events occurred in counties within the Northern District and it was reasonable to expect that relevant documents and witnesses would also be there.

Disposition

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The Clerk was directed to transfer the action, summonses were not to issue from the Southern District, and the order closed the action in that court. The transferee court was left to decide whether Victoria could proceed without prepaying fees. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.