Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 6, 2023

Elevation Health LLC v. BQC Global Supply Inc.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:22-cv-10308
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
10
ContractCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Elevation Health v. BQC Global Supply, Judge Engelmayer entered default judgment on two contract claims, denied it on others, and ordered a damages inquiry.

Who this affects

Elevation Health received default judgment establishing liability on its breach-of-contract claim against Brandon Wong and breach-of-guaranty claim against Jacob Burbas, with damages still to be determined. Default judgment was denied on the remaining claims against Wong, Reyes, and Burbas. BQC Global Supply Inc. and Jing Jing He were no longer subject to the claims after Elevation Health voluntarily dismissed them.

What happened

In Elevation Health, LLC v. BQC Global Supply Inc., Elevation Health said it paid for 100,000 COVID-19 test kits that defendants never delivered. It sued BQC Global Supply Inc., Brandon Wong, Alyssa Reyes, and Jacob Burbas under contract and other legal theories.

None of the defendants answered or appeared. Elevation Health voluntarily dismissed BQC Global Supply Inc. and Jing Jing He, and the court later treated all claims against them as moot. Elevation Health then asked for a default judgment against Wong, Reyes, and Burbas.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer entered default judgment for Elevation Health on its breach-of-contract claim against Wong and breach-of-guaranty claim against Burbas. He denied default judgment on the remaining claims and referred the contract claims to a magistrate judge to determine damages.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Elevation Health LLC v. BQC Global Supply Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-10308
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
June 6, 2023

Background

Elevation Health brought the case based on diversity jurisdiction. It alleged that it contracted to purchase 100,000 BinaxNOW COVID-19 test kits, paid the defendants, and never received the kits or a promised reimbursement. The amended complaint asserted breach of contract against BQC Global Supply Inc. and Brandon Wong; breach of guaranty and promissory estoppel against Jacob Burbas; and civil conspiracy, conversion, unjust enrichment, fraud, and promissory estoppel claims against various defendants.

Elevation Health voluntarily dismissed BQC Global Supply Inc., doing business as BQ Supplies, and Jing Jing He. The court approved that dismissal and treated all claims against those defendants as moot. The remaining defendants—Brandon Wong, Alyssa Reyes, and Jacob Burbas—did not answer or otherwise appear after being served.

Default-judgment standard

The court reviewed Elevation Health’s motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b). It considered whether the defaults were willful, whether the defendants had a potentially meritorious defense, and whether refusing default judgment would prejudice Elevation Health. The court found that the relevant factors favored Elevation Health because service had been shown, the answer deadlines had expired, and the defendants had not appeared to contest the motion.

A default concedes the complaint’s factual allegations, but the court still must decide whether those allegations establish legal liability. The court accepted the factual allegations as true, except allegations concerning damages. The parties’ briefing assumed that New York law applied, and the court applied New York law.

Claims on which default judgment was entered

The court entered default judgment on Elevation Health’s breach-of-contract claim against Wong. Under New York law, that claim requires allegations of a contract, the plaintiff’s performance, the defendant’s failure to perform, and resulting damages. The court found that Elevation Health alleged each element by claiming that it entered the test-kit contract, paid as required, did not receive the kits or reimbursement, and suffered damages.

The court also entered default judgment on Elevation Health’s breach-of-guaranty claim against Burbas. A guaranty claim requires an unconditional guaranty, an underlying debt, and the guarantor’s failure to perform. The court found sufficient allegations that Burbas personally guaranteed that the defendants could provide the test kits and later said he would take direct responsibility for delivery.

Claims on which default judgment was denied

The court denied default judgment on the unjust-enrichment and conversion claims because both were duplicative of the contract claim. The alleged unjust enrichment arose from the same failure to deliver the contracted-for kits, and the conversion claim did not identify a wrong distinct from the contractual obligations.

The court also concluded that Burbas’s promissory-estoppel claim failed because an enforceable contract existed. Under the court’s explanation, promissory estoppel cannot be used when the plaintiff is seeking recovery under an existing enforceable contract.

The fraud claim failed for two reasons. First, the allegations did not identify any statements made by Reyes, much less the details required for a fraud claim. Second, as to all defendants, the fraud allegations duplicated the contract claim because they concerned alleged misrepresentations about performing the contract, and Elevation Health did not allege separate losses such as lost business opportunities.

The civil-conspiracy claim also failed. New York law does not recognize civil conspiracy as an independent tort. To the extent the claim was based on breach of contract, it duplicated that claim; to the extent it was based on fraud or another tort, the complaint did not adequately allege an underlying tort.

Disposition

The court entered a default judgment in favor of Elevation Health on the breach-of-contract and breach-of-guaranty claims and denied default judgment as to the other claims. It referred the case to United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis for an inquest into damages on the claims receiving default judgment. The court also directed Elevation Health to serve the order on each defendant and file proof of service.

The authoritative version

Read the full 10-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.