Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 7, 2023

Nostrum Laboratories, Inc. v. Eversana Life Science Services, LLC

Judge
P. Castel
Docket
1:23-cv-04639
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Nostrum Laboratories v. Eversana Life Sciences Services, Judge Castel ordered Eversana to clarify diversity jurisdiction or face remand to state court.

Who this affects

Eversana must provide the missing incorporation information for LSCS Holdings, Inc. within 14 days. If it does not do so, or cannot truthfully establish complete diversity, the action will be remanded to state court; the order affects the federal court's ability to hear Nostrum's action.

What happened

Nostrum Laboratories, Inc. v. Eversana Life Sciences Services, LLC began in New York state court and was moved to federal court by Eversana based on diversity jurisdiction.

The complaint identifies Nostrum as a New Jersey corporation with principal places of business in New Jersey and Missouri, and Eversana as a Wisconsin limited liability company. Eversana said its sole member was LSCS Holdings, Inc., but did not identify where that corporation was incorporated.

Judge P. Castel ordered Eversana to amend its removal filing within 14 days to provide that information. If Eversana did not amend or could not truthfully allege complete diversity, the court said it would remand the action to state court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nostrum Laboratories, Inc. v. Eversana Life Science Services, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-04639
Judge
P. Castel
Date
June 7, 2023

Background

Nostrum Laboratories, Inc. originally filed this action in the Supreme Court of New York, New York County. Eversana Life Sciences Services, LLC removed the action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, relying on diversity jurisdiction—a form of federal jurisdiction based on the parties' citizenship and the amount in dispute.

The complaint alleges that Nostrum is a New Jersey corporation with its principal places of business in New Jersey and Missouri. It identifies Eversana as a Wisconsin limited liability company. Eversana's notice of removal states that its sole member is LSCS Holdings, Inc., whose principal place of business is in Wilmington, Delaware. The notice does not state where LSCS Holdings, Inc. is incorporated.

Court's analysis

The court explained that, for diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company's citizenship includes the citizenship of each of its members. The notice therefore needed to identify both the relevant information about LSCS Holdings, Inc. and the citizenship necessary to establish complete diversity. The court stated that subject-matter jurisdiction should be addressed at the beginning of a case and that it may raise jurisdictional issues on its own.

Ruling

Judge P. Castel ordered Eversana, within 14 days, to amend its removal petition to identify LSCS Holdings, Inc.'s place of incorporation. The court stated that if Eversana failed to amend or could not truthfully allege complete diversity of citizenship, the action would be remanded to state court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further notice. The order did not itself remand the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.