Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 6, 2023

Prado v. ICE Agent Perez

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:18-cv-09806
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureImmigration
In one sentence

In Prado v. Perez, Judge Oetken ordered the settlement payment treated as made before Prado’s 65th birthday.

Who this affects

Jesus Prado and the administration of his settlement payment; the order was intended to address the payment’s potential effect on his future eligibility for Medicaid-funded long-term care, without deciding that eligibility.

What happened

Prado v. ICE Agent Perez involved a request about payment of a settlement that the court had approved in 2021. Jesus Prado’s lawyers said the payment had been delayed while he obtained an individual tax identification number and enrolled in a special needs trust.

Prado’s lawyers said receiving the payment before his 65th birthday was important because federal Medicaid rules can penalize certain asset transfers after a person turns 65. They asked the court to treat the payment as made on June 2, 2023, even though the payment would be received later. Defense counsel did not oppose the request.

Judge Oetken granted the request and ordered that the settlement payment be treated as made on June 2, 2023. The clerk was directed to close the docket entry concerning the request. The order did not determine Prado’s eligibility for Medicaid or other federal health-care benefits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Prado v. ICE Agent Perez · No. 1:18-cv-09806
Judge
James Oetken
Date
June 6, 2023

Background

The court had approved the parties’ settlement on July 21, 2021. The settlement included a payment to Jesus Prado. According to Prado’s letter-motion, the payment had not yet been made because Prado needed to enroll in a special needs trust, which would administer the settlement funds and distribute small amounts for basic necessities.

Prado did not have a Social Security number and therefore had to obtain an individual tax identification number from the Internal Revenue Service. The letter said the IRS initially delayed and then incorrectly denied his application. After a new application, the IRS issued the number on March 21, 2023. Further administrative delays followed before Prado could enroll in the trust. The expected payment date was close to Prado’s 65th birthday on June 5, 2023.

Request

Prado asked the court to treat the settlement payment as legally made on June 2, 2023, even if the payment was received later. His lawyers argued that this date would preserve his ability to qualify for Medicaid funding for long-term care under an exception for assets transferred to a trust established solely for the benefit of a disabled person under age 65. The letter stated that defense counsel did not oppose the request.

Ruling

Judge J. Paul Oetken ordered that the settlement payment be deemed made, retroactively, as of June 2, 2023. The court also directed the clerk to close the docket entry for the request. The order included a disclaimer that it did not constitute an admission by the United States about Prado’s eligibility for benefits or coverage under any federal health-care program, and did not limit the government’s ability to make that determination.

Disposition and scope

This was an ancillary order concerning the timing and legal treatment of a settlement payment. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or decide whether Prado qualified for Medicaid or any other benefit.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.