Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 8, 2023

Kornegay v. Warden John/Jane Doe

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-04756
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Kornegay v. Warden John/Jane Doe, Judge Swain transferred the habeas petition to West Virginia because the petitioner was confined there.

Who this affects

Raymond Kornegay, whose detention petition was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Northern District of West Virginia.

What happened

Raymond Kornegay, who was incarcerated at FCI Gilmer in West Virginia, filed a self-represented petition challenging his detention and seeking release. The petition was brought under a federal law allowing challenges to detention.

The court explained that a detention challenge generally belongs in the district where the person is confined because that court has authority over the custodian. FCI Gilmer is in the Northern District of West Virginia.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to that district and closed the Southern District of New York case. The Northern District of West Virginia will decide whether Kornegay may proceed without paying filing fees, and the court denied fee-free status for any appeal from the transfer order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kornegay v. Warden John/Jane Doe · No. 1:23-cv-04756
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 8, 2023

Background

Raymond Kornegay, who was incarcerated at FCI Gilmer in Glenville, West Virginia, filed a self-represented petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He challenged his detention and sought release. The named respondent was Warden John/Jane Doe.

Reason for Transfer

For a petition under Section 2241, the court must have authority over the person responsible for the petitioner’s custody. A challenge to physical confinement generally belongs in the federal district where the petitioner is confined. Because FCI Gilmer is located in the Northern District of West Virginia, the Southern District of New York concluded that the Northern District was the proper venue. The court relied on 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), which permits transfer in the interest of justice.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. The order closed the Southern District of New York case. It stated that the transferee court would decide whether Kornegay could proceed without paying fees. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal from the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.