Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 9, 2023

Cassell v. United States of America

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:23-cv-01583
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureTort
In one sentence

In Cassell v. United States, Judge Schofield granted an application to adjourn the initial conference and related filing deadlines.

Who this affects

The parties in Ronald Cassell’s Federal Tort Claims Act case, including the United States and the defendants identified in the Government’s letter.

What happened

In Ronald Cassell v. United States of America, the Government asked to postpone the initial pretrial conference because it had recently been served, needed more time to review the complaint, and expected new lead counsel to join the case.

The request also noted that the Government’s response to the complaint was not due until July 21, 2023. The plaintiff consented to the requested postponement.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield granted the application, moved the conference to August 2, 2023, at 4:20 p.m., and required the parties to file their joint letter and proposed case-management plan by July 26, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cassell v. United States of America · No. 1:23-cv-01583
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
June 9, 2023

Background

The Government, represented by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, asked the court to adjourn the initial pretrial conference and related filing deadlines. The case includes a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, a federal law that permits certain tort claims against the United States.

The conference had been scheduled for June 28, 2023, with the parties’ joint status letter and proposed case-management plan due June 21, 2023. The Government requested a postponement of 30 days or a later date, with the filings due one week before the conference. The letter stated that the plaintiff consented to the request.

Reasons for the Request

The Government said it had only recently been served with the complaint and that the Postal Service needed additional time to review the complaint, gather information, and provide it to the Government’s lawyers. It also said that Alex Kristofcak, who was expected to become lead counsel after joining the United States Attorney’s Office in early July, should be present at the initial conference. Finally, the Government noted that its response to the complaint was not due until July 21, 2023, and argued that scheduling the conference after that deadline would promote efficient case management.

The letter also argued that the United States Postal Service and its driver, Loucretia Austin, were not proper defendants under the Federal Tort Claims Act and asked the court to dismiss the claims against them. The text provided does not show that the court ruled on that request.

Ruling

Judge Lorna G. Schofield’s order states, “Application GRANTED.” The court adjourned the initial pretrial conference to August 2, 2023, at 4:20 p.m., and ordered the parties to file their joint letter and proposed case-management plan by July 26, 2023. The order addressed the scheduling request; the provided text does not show a ruling on the proposed dismissal of the Postal Service or Austin.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.