Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 12, 2023

Lastres v. City Of New York

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:21-cv-10742
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureCivil Rights
In one sentence

In Lastres v. City Of New York, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

Daniel Lastres and the named defendants; the action was closed, subject to a possible application to restore it within 30 days.

What happened

Lastres v. City Of New York involved Daniel Lastres and the City of New York, police officers, and other named defendants. The court was informed that the case had settled.

The court discontinued the action without costs to any party. The order allowed a party to ask to restore the case to the court’s docket within 30 days, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

Judge Ronnie Abrams entered the order on June 12, 2023. The order also stated that any settlement-enforcement request would require the settlement terms to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lastres v. City Of New York · No. 1:21-cv-10742
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
June 12, 2023

Background

The opinion states that the case had been reported as settled. The listed defendants were the City of New York, Police Officer Nikolas Liandrakis, Captain Christopher Treubig, and New York Police Department officers identified as John and Jane Doe 1–10, sued individually and in their official capacities.

Court’s Action

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It directed that any application to reopen the action be filed within 30 days of the order and stated that a later application could be denied solely because it was late.

The court further stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain authority to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

Disposition

Judge Ronnie Abrams discontinued the action without costs and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The opinion does not address the merits of the underlying claims or disclose the settlement’s terms.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.