Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 13, 2023

Seaton v. K. Dew Realty Corp.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:22-cv-08192
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
EmploymentCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Seaton v. K. Dew Realty Corp., Judge Engelmayer approved a $69,528 settlement and $34,764 in attorney fees, closing the case.

Who this affects

Kevin Seaton, K. Dew Realty Corp. and the other defendants, and Seaton's attorney, Abdul K. Hassan.

What happened

Seaton v. K. Dew Realty Corp. involved claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement to the court.

Under the agreement, the defendants agreed to pay Kevin Seaton $69,528, with $34,764 allocated to his attorney, Abdul K. Hassan, as attorney fees. The court found that the agreement was reached fairly and was fair and reasonable.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer approved the settlement agreement, directed the clerk to terminate all pending motions, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Seaton v. K. Dew Realty Corp. · No. 1:22-cv-08192
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
June 13, 2023

Background

Kevin Seaton brought an action against K. Dew Realty Corp. and other defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. On June 6, 2023, the parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement for court review.

Settlement Terms

Under the agreement, the defendants agreed to pay Seaton $69,528. The agreement allocated $34,764 to Seaton's attorney, Abdul K. Hassan, as attorney fees. The court described this as one third of the settlement amount, after costs, going to plaintiff's counsel.

Ruling

The court concluded that the settlement was reached through procedurally fair means and was fair and reasonable under the standard established in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer approved the agreement. The clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.