Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 14, 2023

Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:22-cv-07197
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe, Judge Engelmayer ordered a joint letter confirming that the proposed voluntary dismissal was not obtained through payment or another benefit.

Who this affects

Debra Nochimson, Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc., and Michael G. Memon were affected because the court required the parties to confirm whether the proposed voluntary dismissal involved a settlement benefit requiring court review.

What happened

Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc. involves claims by Debra Nochimson, including claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

On June 13, 2023, Nochimson filed a notice saying she voluntarily dismissed the action. The court noted that the parties proposed dismissing her claims through a stipulation, but the opinion does not state that the court had approved or entered the dismissal.

Judge Engelmayer directed the parties to file a joint letter by June 23, 2023, confirming that the dismissal was not part of a settlement requiring court review. The parties specifically had to confirm that the dismissal was not secured by any payment, promise, or other benefit from the defendants.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nochimson v. Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-07197
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
June 14, 2023

Background

Debra Nochimson brought claims against Oasis Luxe Management & Co. Inc. and Michael G. Memon, including claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing certain wage and hour matters. On June 13, 2023, Nochimson filed a notice of voluntary dismissal.

Court’s Action

The court directed the parties to file a joint letter by June 23, 2023. They must confirm that the stipulation they proposed to use to dismiss Nochimson’s claims was not part of a settlement requiring court review. In particular, they must confirm that the dismissal was not obtained through any payment, promise, or other benefit offered by a defendant.

Result

The order did not state that the court approved the dismissal or resolve the underlying claims. It required the parties to provide the specified confirmation. The order was signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on June 14, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.