Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 15, 2023

Larkin v. SailawayNY

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:22-cv-10737
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Larkin v. SailawayNY, Judge Schofield ordered settlement materials after a proposed agreement and canceled all conferences and trial.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants were required to submit the settlement materials by July 6, 2023; all parties were affected by the cancellation of conferences and trial.

What happened

In Larkin v. SailawayNY, the court was told that the parties had reached a settlement agreement in principle.

The court ordered the parties to submit the settlement agreement and a joint letter with supporting evidence by July 6, 2023. The materials had to address the findings needed for the court to decide whether the settlement was fair and reasonable.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield also canceled all conferences and the trial. The order did not approve the settlement or decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Larkin v. SailawayNY · No. 1:22-cv-10737
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
June 15, 2023

Background

The court was informed on June 14, 2023, that the parties had reached a settlement agreement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Court’s Order

The court ordered the parties to submit two items by July 6, 2023: (1) the settlement agreement and (2) a joint letter with supporting evidence. The letter had to address the findings the court must make to approve the settlement as fair and reasonable. The court cited decisions describing factors district courts use to evaluate proposed settlements.

The court also ordered that all conferences and the trial were canceled. The order did not state that the settlement was approved, and it did not resolve the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.