Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2023

Joseph v. Savian Pizza Corp.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:23-cv-01960
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In Joseph v. Savian Pizza Corp., Judge Liman transferred the case to the Eastern District of New York because venue was improper in the Southern District.

Who this affects

Rosalyn Joseph and defendants Savian Pizza Corp., Trinacria Group Staten Island Inc., and Salvatore Lopiccolo; the case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York.

What happened

Rosalyn Joseph sued Savian Pizza Corp., Trinacria Group Staten Island Inc., and Salvatore Lopiccolo over alleged violations of federal wage law and New York law arising from her work as a delivery worker. The complaint stated that the relevant events occurred in the Eastern District of New York.

The court determined that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York because Joseph did not allege that relevant events occurred there, and it did not appear that any defendant resided there. The case could have been brought in the Eastern District, and the court found that transferring it was more appropriate than dismissing it.

Judge Lewis J. Liman ordered the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The order did not decide the underlying wage or state-law claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Joseph v. Savian Pizza Corp. · No. 1:23-cv-01960
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
June 16, 2023

Background Rosalyn Joseph filed claims against Savian Pizza Corp., Trinacria Group Staten Island Inc., and Salvatore Lopiccolo. She alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hours law, and New York State law arising from her employment as a delivery worker at defendants’ pizzeria. The complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York, but it stated that venue was proper in the Eastern District of New York because all relevant events and the alleged acts and omissions occurred there.

Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), when a case is filed in the wrong federal district, the court may dismiss it or, if that serves the interests of justice, transfer it to a district where the case could have been brought. The court concluded that venue did not properly lie in the Southern District of New York. Joseph did not allege that any relevant events or omissions occurred there, and it did not appear that any defendant resided there. The court concluded that the action could have been brought in the Eastern District of New York.

Disposition The court determined that transfer, rather than dismissal, was in the interests of justice. Judge Lewis J. Liman directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The order addressed venue only and did not resolve the merits of Joseph’s federal or state-law claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.