Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2023

Almanzar v. Silver Star Properties Corp.

Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Docket
1:23-cv-00819
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Almanzar v. Silver Star Properties Corp.: Judge Broderick ordered the parties to submit their FLSA settlement for fairness review.

Who this affects

Rafael Almanzar and Silver Star Properties Corp., whose proposed FLSA settlement must be submitted for court review; any attorney-fee request must also be supported by billing records.

What happened

In Almanzar v. Silver Star Properties Corp., Rafael Almanzar and Silver Star Properties Corp. told the court they had reached a settlement in a Fair Labor Standards Act case.

The court explained that the parties could not privately settle the wage claims without approval from the court or the Department of Labor. It ordered them to provide the settlement terms and a joint explanation of why the agreement was fair and reasonable within 30 days.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick also ordered the parties to provide supporting records for any attorney-fee award, including billing records showing each attorney’s dates, hours, and work performed. The order did not approve the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Almanzar v. Silver Star Properties Corp. · No. 1:23-cv-00819
Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Date
June 16, 2023

Background

The parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement in Rafael Almanzar’s Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) case against Silver Star Properties Corp. The court stated that FLSA claims cannot be privately settled without approval from either the district court or the Department of Labor.

Court’s analysis

The court explained that an FLSA settlement must be fair and reasonable. To evaluate the agreement, the court would consider the total circumstances, including:

- the plaintiff’s possible recovery; - the burdens and expenses the settlement would avoid in proving the claims and defenses; - the litigation risks faced by the parties; - whether experienced counsel reached the agreement through arm’s-length bargaining; and - the possibility of fraud or collusion.

If the agreement included attorney’s fees, the court would separately evaluate whether those fees were reasonable. The parties would need to provide factual support for any fee award, including contemporaneous billing records showing, for each attorney, the date, hours worked, and nature of the work.

Order

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the parties to submit the settlement terms within 30 days. He also ordered them to submit a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why the settlement was a fair and reasonable compromise and addressing the listed factors. If the agreement included attorney’s fees, the parties were ordered to provide the required factual support. The order did not approve the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.