Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 20, 2023

Lema-Yaucan v. Melecio

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:23-cv-03860
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Lema-Yaucan v. Melecio, Judge Krause ordered a refund of a duplicate filing fee and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Holger Lema-Yaucan will receive a refund of the duplicate $5 filing-fee payment. His ability to appeal this order without prepaying fees was denied.

What happened

In Lema-Yaucan v. Melecio, Holger Lema-Yaucan filed a self-represented petition under a federal law allowing challenges to state-court convictions. The court had instructed him to pay a $5 filing fee or request permission to proceed without paying it. He paid the $5 fee twice.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to refund the second $5 payment and mail it to Lema-Yaucan at his address on record. The court also determined that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying the filing fee for an appeal.

Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause issued the order on June 20, 2023. The order addressed the duplicate payment and appeal-fee status; it did not decide the underlying petition.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lema-Yaucan v. Melecio · No. 7:23-cv-03860
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
June 20, 2023

Background

Holger Lema-Yaucan filed this self-represented petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 10, 2023, the court directed him within 30 days either to pay the $5 filing fee or to submit a signed application requesting permission to proceed without prepaying fees. The court received his $5 payment that same day. On June 12, 2023, it received a second $5 payment from him.

Rulings

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a refund of the second $5 payment and mail it to Lema-Yaucan at his address of record.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order did not rule on the substance of Lema-Yaucan's petition.

Judge

Andrew E. Krause, United States Magistrate Judge, issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.