Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 21, 2023

StoneX Group Inc. v. shipman

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:23-cv-00613
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

StoneX Group v. Shipman: Judge Figueredo ordered Shipman to pay $5,850 for failing to attend his deposition.

Who this affects

Defendant Howard Shipman was ordered to pay $5,850 to the plaintiffs, StoneX Group, Inc. et al., for deposition-related expenses and attorney fees.

What happened

In StoneX Group, Inc. et al. v. Howard Shipman, the plaintiffs asked the court to impose costs after Shipman did not appear for his scheduled deposition on May 24, 2023.

The court found that the plaintiffs reasonably incurred $1,685 for a stenographer and videographer. It also found that Shipman’s lawyers should have told the plaintiffs before or at the scheduled start time that Shipman would not appear, so the plaintiffs could recover payment for two hours of attorney time.

Judge Valerie Figueredo approved the requested rate for partner Lloyd B. Chinn but reduced associate Daryl G. Leon’s hourly rate from $1,102.50 to $800. The court ordered Shipman to pay the plaintiffs $5,850.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
StoneX Group Inc. v. shipman · No. 1:23-cv-00613
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
June 21, 2023

Background

The plaintiffs requested $6,455 in costs and attorney fees under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(d)(1)(A)(i), which allows sanctions when a party fails to attend that party’s own deposition. Shipman failed to appear for his scheduled deposition on May 24, 2023.

Of the requested amount, $1,685 represented stenographer and videographer costs. The remaining $4,770 represented two hours of attorney time while the plaintiffs’ attorneys waited for Shipman to appear.

Court’s Analysis

The court determined that the stenographer and videographer expenses were directly connected to the deposition and were wasted because Shipman did not attend. The court also found that the events leading to Shipman’s nonappearance were known to Shipman and his counsel several hours before the deposition. Because the plaintiffs’ counsel was not notified before the deposition or, at the latest, at its scheduled start time, the court found that the failure to provide notice was not substantially justified.

The court approved the requested hourly rate of $1,285.50 for Lloyd B. Chinn, a partner at Proskauer Rose. It found that Daryl G. Leon’s requested hourly rate of $1,102.50 was higher than the rate typically approved for associates at similar firms in the district and reduced it to $800.

Ruling

Judge Valerie Figueredo ordered Shipman to pay $5,850, described in the order as the reasonable expenses and fees incurred by the plaintiffs as a result of his failure to appear for the noticed deposition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.