Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 23, 2023

G.B. v. New York City Department of Education

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:21-cv-11211
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Liman directed motions to modify an earlier ruling after the appeals were sent back for reconsideration.

Who this affects

The parties to N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Education, including the plaintiff and the defendant, were given an opportunity to seek modification of the Court’s earlier opinion and order.

What happened

In N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Education, the plaintiff appealed a judgment entered on March 31, 2023. The defendant also appealed that judgment.

The Second Circuit later decided a separate case that could affect this case and sent both appeals back to the District Court for reconsideration in light of that decision.

Judge Lewis J. Liman directed any party seeking changes to the Court’s March 30 opinion and order to file a motion within 21 days of the June 23, 2023 order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
G.B. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:21-cv-11211
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
June 23, 2023

Background

The plaintiff appealed from a judgment entered on March 31, 2023. The defendant cross-appealed from the same judgment. The opinion does not describe the issues decided in that judgment.

Second Circuit Proceedings

On June 21, 2023, the Second Circuit decided a separate appeal that the District Court said might be relevant to this case. The Second Circuit sent the appeal and cross-appeal back to the District Court for reconsideration in light of that decision.

Ruling

The Court directed any party who believed that its March 30, 2023 opinion and order should be modified in light of the Second Circuit’s decision to file a motion seeking that change within 21 days of this order. The order did not itself modify the earlier opinion or order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.