Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 23, 2023

Arriaga v. Annucci

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:23-cv-01941
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Arriaga v. Annucci, Judge Briccetti directed the New York Attorney General to identify unnamed defendants after Arriaga filed an amended complaint.

Who this affects

Anthony Arriaga, the unnamed John and Jane Doe defendants, the other named defendants, and the New York State Attorney General, which was directed to identify the unnamed defendants and provide service addresses.

What happened

In Arriaga v. Annucci, Anthony Arriaga filed an amended complaint that added information about conduct involving three unnamed defendants. He also submitted a transfer order, which the court treated as attached to the amended complaint.

Because Arriaga was representing himself, the court said he was entitled to help identifying the unnamed defendants. The order required the New York State Attorney General to determine their identities and provide addresses where they could be served.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti set July 14, 2023, as the deadline for that information. The deadline for all defendants to answer, file a motion, or otherwise respond remained August 31, 2023. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Arriaga v. Annucci · No. 7:23-cv-01941
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
June 23, 2023

Background

On June 20, 2023, Anthony Arriaga filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint included additional information about the conduct attributed to the John and Jane Doe defendants. Arriaga had also filed a June 15 letter attaching a transfer order documenting his transfer from Sing Sing Correctional Facility on August 5, 2022. The court treated that transfer order as attached to the amended complaint.

Identification of Unnamed Defendants

The court noted that a person representing himself in court is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying an unnamed defendant. The court therefore directed the New York State Attorney General, by July 14, 2023, to determine the identity of each John or Jane Doe defendant and provide the address where each could be served with the lawsuit.

Other Deadline and Disposition

The court stated that the deadline for all defendants to answer, file a motion, or otherwise respond to the amended complaint remained August 31, 2023. Chambers was directed to mail a copy of the order to Arriaga at the address on the docket. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti's order addressed identification and service-related procedures; it did not decide the merits of Arriaga's claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.