Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 23, 2023

Villeti v. Guidepoint Global LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:18-cv-10200
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Villeti v. Guidepoint Global LLC, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by July 24, 2023.

Who this affects

Valentia Villeti and Guidepoint Global LLC; the action was discontinued, its deadlines and trial dates were vacated, and the dismissal would become with prejudice if no restoration request was made by July 24, 2023.

What happened

In Villeti v. Guidepoint Global LLC, the court received a letter stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. It allowed either party to seek restoration of the case if the settlement could not be put in writing, but the request had to be made by July 24, 2023.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also vacated all deadlines and scheduled dates, including the final pretrial conference and trial. If no request to restore the case was made by July 24, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Villeti v. Guidepoint Global LLC · No. 1:18-cv-10200
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
June 23, 2023

Background

Guidepoint Global LLC informed the court by letter that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by July 24, 2023.

The court further ordered that all deadlines and dates were vacated, including the dates for the final pretrial conference and the beginning of trial. The order stated that if no application to restore the action was made by July 24, 2023, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored under that order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.