Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 27, 2023

Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:21-cv-09221
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin: Judge Failla granted a request to redact and seal sensitive documents.

Who this affects

The petitioners, Hui Qin, the Court, and the public’s access to the materials filed at docket entry 183 were affected. The sealed entry is viewable only by the parties and the Court.

What happened

In Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin, the petitioners asked to redact their sanctions-motion memorandum and seal exhibits containing Hui Qin’s personal and financial information.

The requested materials included bank correspondence, tax-return information, a credit-card image, and other documents marked confidential under a protective order.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application, ordered docket entry 183 sealed and viewable only by the parties and the Court, and directed the Clerk to terminate the motion at docket entry 180.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Qin · No. 1:21-cv-09221
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
June 27, 2023

Background The petitioners—Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership, Huzhou Huihengying Equity Investment Partnership, and Huzhou Huirongsheng Equity Investment Partnership—requested permission to file certain materials with redactions and other materials under seal. The request accompanied the petitioners’ renewed motion for sanctions against Seiden Law LLP.

Materials at Issue The petitioners sought to redact their memorandum supporting the renewed sanctions motion and to file under seal exhibits to the declaration of Carol Lee. The listed exhibits included bank correspondence, a letter from Seiden to petitioners’ counsel, an image of a credit card, an email to Qin’s counsel, an invoice from Qin’s counsel, and documents containing tax-return information. The petitioners said the materials contained sensitive personal or financial information, including Qin’s bank-account and tax-return information, and that some had been marked confidential under the parties’ stipulated protective order.

Ruling The Court granted the application. The Clerk was directed to maintain docket entry 183 under seal, with access limited to the parties and the Court. The Clerk was also directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 180. Judge Katherine Polk Failla signed the order on June 27, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.