Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 28, 2023

Penn-Star Insurance Company v. CO/Action Specialty Insurance Group

Judge
P. Castel
Docket
1:23-cv-04995
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureInsurance
In one sentence

In Penn-Star Insurance Company v. CO/Action Specialty Insurance Group, Judge Castel ordered diversity allegations corrected within 14 days or face dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs must amend their complaint to clarify the parties’ citizenship and entity information within 14 days. The action could be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction if they do not amend or cannot truthfully establish diversity of citizenship.

What happened

Penn-Star Insurance Company, Evergreen Tiebout Housing Development Fund Corp., and Evergreen Tiebout, LLC sued CO/Action Specialty Insurance Group based on alleged diversity of citizenship. The court found that the complaint did not clearly establish the citizenship of the parties, including the members of the limited liability companies and limited partnership.

The court identified several problems: it said Larry Hirschfield’s residence did not establish his citizenship; the complaint did not identify the members or citizenship of Community Development Trust, L.P.; it described CDT Evergreen, LLC as not yet formed; and it gave inconsistent information about the corporate forms and citizenship of Penn-Star and CO/Action Specialty.

Judge Castel ordered the plaintiffs to amend the complaint within 14 days to correct these issues. The court did not dismiss the action at this stage, but stated that it would dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without further notice if the plaintiffs failed to amend or could not truthfully allege diversity of citizenship.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Penn-Star Insurance Company v. CO/Action Specialty Insurance Group · No. 1:23-cv-04995
Judge
P. Castel
Date
June 28, 2023

Background

The plaintiffs—Penn-Star Insurance Company, Evergreen Tiebout Housing Development Fund Corp., and Evergreen Tiebout, LLC—brought the action based on diversity of citizenship. The complaint alleged that Evergreen Tiebout, LLC had two members: Evergreen Tiebout Manager, LLC and CDT Evergreen, LLC. It alleged that Larry Hirschfield was the sole member of Evergreen Tiebout Manager, LLC and described him as a New York resident. It also alleged that CDT Evergreen, LLC had one member, Community Development Trust, L.P., while simultaneously stating that CDT Evergreen, LLC had not yet been formed as a recognized legal entity.

The complaint described CO/Action Specialty Insurance Group as organized under New Jersey law and having its principal place of business in New Jersey. But the civil cover sheet identified the defendant as a citizen of New York. The complaint also referred to Penn-Star and CO/Action Specialty as insurance companies without clearly stating their corporate forms.

Jurisdictional analysis

For a case based on diversity of citizenship, the court explained that the complaint must identify the citizenship of every natural-person member of a limited liability company or limited partnership, as well as the place of incorporation and principal place of business of corporate members. The court stated that the complaint did not properly allege Evergreen Tiebout, LLC’s citizenship.

The allegation that Larry Hirschfield was a New York resident was insufficient because residence is not the same as citizenship. The complaint also failed to identify the members and citizenship of Community Development Trust, L.P. The court said the complaint did not explain how CDT Evergreen, LLC, which it described as unformed, could participate as a plaintiff, or alternatively identify the state law under which it had been organized.

The court further found that the allegations about the corporate forms and citizenship of Penn-Star and CO/Action Specialty were unclear and inconsistent, particularly because the complaint’s description of the defendant conflicted with the civil cover sheet.

Order

Within 14 days, the plaintiffs were ordered to amend the complaint to: properly allege Larry Hirschfield’s citizenship; specify the corporate form of Penn-Star and CO/Action Specialty; clarify the defendant’s citizenship; clarify how CDT Evergreen, LLC was participating as an unformed limited liability company or identify the state law under which it was organized; and properly allege the citizenship of each member of Community Development Trust, L.P.

The court did not dismiss the action in this order. It stated that if the plaintiffs failed to amend, or could not truthfully allege diversity of citizenship, the action would be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without further notice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.