Lopez v. Marlboro Diamond Castle, LLC

Background

The opinion states that the parties appeared for an initial case-management conference on June 26, 2023. After reviewing the pleadings and consulting with the parties, the court entered a scheduling order under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Scheduling and discovery requirements

The parties could amend the pleadings and join parties until August 2, 2023. After that date, further amendments or joinder required good cause. Fact discovery had to be completed by October 26, 2023, and each side was limited to two depositions.

The order directed counsel to follow the court’s individual procedures for discovery disputes and to comply with Rules 1 and 26(b)(1). It also directed counsel to understand and follow their obligations under Rules 34 and 26(g), including discussing ways to reduce disputes about overly broad or insufficiently specific document requests and responses. The court warned that noncompliance could have serious consequences. It stated that requests for all documents on a broad topic are presumptively improper and that an objection that does not adequately explain its grounds may be forfeited. The cited authority stated that discovery responses lacking specific objections and a clear indication of whether responsive materials are being withheld may waive objections other than privilege.

The parties also had to file a joint status letter by July 26, 2023, updating the court on mediation and discovery.

Disposition and effect

Judge Katharine H. Parker entered a case-management and scheduling order. The opinion does not decide the merits of the claims or rule on liability. The order affects the plaintiff and defendant by setting deadlines and governing their participation in pleadings, mediation, and discovery.