Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 28, 2023

Mund & Fester GmbH & Co. Kg v. Hamburg Sud A/S & Co. KG

Judge
Clarke
Docket
1:22-cv-06929
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mund & Fester v. Hamburg Sud, Judge Clarke reassigned the case and ordered a joint status letter by July 7, 2023.

Who this affects

Mund & Fester GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg Sud A/S & Co. KG, and their counsel were affected by the reassignment and joint-letter requirement.

What happened

Mund & Fester GmbH & Co. KG v. Hamburg Sud A/S & Co. KG was reassigned to a different judge, and the court said existing orders, dates, and deadlines would remain in effect unless changed.

The parties were ordered to file a joint letter by July 7, 2023, describing the case, jurisdiction and venue, deadlines, motions, appeals, discovery, settlement discussions, possible alternative dispute resolution, and estimated trial length. Scheduled conferences or oral arguments were postponed pending further instructions.

Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke issued the reassignment notice and status-report order on June 28, 2023. The opinion does not decide the parties’ underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mund & Fester GmbH & Co. Kg v. Hamburg Sud A/S & Co. KG · No. 1:22-cv-06929
Judge
Clarke
Date
June 28, 2023

Background

The case was reassigned to Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. The court stated that, unless it later ordered otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines would remain in effect. Any conference or oral argument already scheduled before the court was adjourned pending further order.

Order

The court ordered the parties to file a joint letter on the electronic filing system by July 7, 2023. The letter could not exceed five pages, except that lengthy information about the citizenship of members, partners, shareholders, or trustees could be placed in an appendix outside the page limit.

The letter had to provide:

- Counsel’s names and current contact information; - A brief description of the case, defenses, and important legal and factual issues; - The basis for federal jurisdiction and venue, including the citizenship information required for diversity jurisdiction; - Existing deadlines and cutoff dates; - The status of prior matters and scheduled conferences; - Descriptions of outstanding motions; - The status of any appeals; - A detailed description of completed and remaining discovery, including depositions; - A brief description of settlement discussions without exact offers or demands; - The parties’ views on possible alternative dispute resolution, including a settlement conference, mediation, or a private mediator; - An estimate of the trial’s length; and - Any other information that could help move the case toward settlement or trial.

If the case had already been settled or otherwise terminated, the parties did not have to file the letter or appear, provided they filed appropriate proof of termination before the deadline. The court also stated that requests for extensions or adjournments had to be made by letter-motion filed at least 48 hours before the applicable deadline or conference and had to include specified information.

Disposition and Significance

This opinion is an administrative case-management order. It does not decide the merits of Mund & Fester GmbH & Co. KG’s claims or Hamburg Sud A/S & Co. KG’s defenses. Judge Clarke reassigned the case and ordered the joint status letter; the opinion does not state that any motion was granted or denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.