Toro v. Universal Pool Co., Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-10892
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Toro v. Universal Pool Co., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to an August 5 restoration deadline.
Jasmine Toro, the people she sought to represent, and Universal Pool Co., Inc.; the action was discontinued subject to the stated restoration deadline.
What happened
Jasmine Toro brought this action on behalf of herself and others described as similarly situated against Universal Pool Co., Inc.
The defendant informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed restoration to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and an application was made by August 5, 2023.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no application to restore the action was made by August 5, 2023, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Toro v. Universal Pool Co., Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-10892
- Vyskocil
- July 5, 2023
Background
Jasmine Toro sued Universal Pool Co., Inc., on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated. The opinion does not describe the claims or the proposed settlement’s terms.
Settlement and Order
The court received a letter from Universal Pool Co., Inc., stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The court therefore ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party.
The order allowed the action to be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by August 5, 2023.
Disposition
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no application to restore the action was made by August 5, 2023, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice. The opinion does not state whether the settlement was ultimately reduced to writing or whether any application to restore the action was filed.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.