Pastreichet al v. Securiguard, Inc.
- Clarke
- 1:23-cv-02690
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Manny Pastreich v. Securiguard, Judge Clarke reassigned the case and ordered a joint status letter by July 19, 2023.
The parties and their counsel are affected. Counsel must file the joint status letter and follow the court’s procedures for extensions and adjournments.
What happened
In Manny Pastreich, as Trustee, et al. v. Securiguard, Inc., the case was reassigned to Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. The opinion does not decide the parties’ underlying dispute.
Judge Clarke ordered the parties to file a joint letter of no more than five pages by July 19, 2023. The letter must update the court on counsel, the case’s issues and jurisdiction, deadlines, conferences, motions, appeals, discovery, settlement discussions, possible alternative dispute resolution, estimated trial length, and other information relevant to moving the case toward settlement or trial.
Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke also ordered that prior orders, dates, and deadlines remain in effect unless changed, while any currently scheduled conference or oral argument before her is adjourned pending further order. The order also explains procedures for requesting extensions or adjournments.
The detailed version
- Pastreichet al v. Securiguard, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-02690
- Clarke
- July 5, 2023
Nature of the Order
This is a notice of reassignment and case-management order. The case was reassigned to United States District Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. The opinion does not resolve the merits of the dispute between the plaintiffs and Securiguard, Inc.
Orders After Reassignment
Unless the court orders otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines remain in effect despite the reassignment. Any currently scheduled conference or oral argument before Judge Clarke is adjourned pending further order. The court directed all counsel to familiarize themselves with Judge Clarke’s individual rules and practices.
Joint Status Letter
The parties must file a joint letter on the court’s electronic filing system by July 19, 2023. The letter may not exceed five pages, except that lengthy information about the citizenship of members, shareholders, partners, or trustees may be placed in an appendix outside the page limit. The letter must separately address:
- counsel’s names and current contact information; - the nature of the case, principal defenses, and major legal and factual issues; - why federal jurisdiction and venue are proper, including the basis for diversity jurisdiction if applicable and required citizenship information for business entities and trusts; - existing deadlines and cutoff dates; - previously scheduled conferences that have not occurred and the matters to be discussed; - outstanding motions, including their dates and requested relief; - pending appeals; - discovery already completed, including the number of depositions taken by each party and any discovery needed for meaningful settlement discussions; - the status of prior settlement discussions without revealing exact offers or demands; - whether the parties have discussed alternative dispute resolution and whether a settlement conference, district mediation, or private mediator would be appropriate; - the estimated trial length; and - any other information that could help advance the case toward settlement or trial, including dispositive or novel issues.
If the case has been settled or otherwise terminated, counsel do not have to submit the letter or appear if proof of termination is filed on the docket before the deadline using the appropriate electronic-filing event.
Extensions and Adjournments
Requests for extensions or adjournments must be made by a letter-motion filed electronically at least 48 hours before the applicable deadline or conference. The request must identify the original and requested new dates, prior extension or adjournment requests and their outcomes, the reason for the request, the opposing party’s position, and, when applicable, the next scheduled court appearance. Unless the parties are notified that a conference has been adjourned, it will take place as scheduled.
Disposition
The court entered case-management directives following reassignment. It did not grant or deny a merits motion, dismiss any claim, or decide the parties’ underlying legal issues.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.