Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 6, 2023

Lugo v. The State of New York

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:23-cv-05602
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Lugo v. State of New York, Judge Swain ordered Lugo to pay filing fees or submit applications to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Ulyse Lugo, who was required to pay the filing fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Ulyse Lugo v. The State of New York, et al., Ulyse Lugo filed a civil lawsuit without paying the required fees or submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying them. The order states that Lugo is incarcerated at Essex County Correctional Facility and is representing himself.

The court gave Lugo 30 days to either pay $402 in fees or submit the required application and authorization. The authorization would allow the filing fee to be deducted from his prison account in installments. The court said no response from the defendants was required yet and that the case would be processed if Lugo complied; if he did not, the action would be dismissed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the merits of Lugo’s claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lugo v. The State of New York · No. 1:23-cv-05602
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
July 6, 2023

Background

Ulyse Lugo filed this civil action without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization. The opinion states that Lugo is incarcerated at Essex County Correctional Facility and is proceeding without a lawyer.

Fee requirements

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $402—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. To make that request, Lugo had to submit a signed application and a prisoner authorization. If permission is granted, the $350 filing fee must still be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to deduct those payments and provide certified account statements for the previous six months.

Order

Within 30 days of the order, Lugo was required to pay the $402 in fees or submit the application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 23-CV-5602 (LTS). The court stated that no answer from the defendants was required at that time. If Lugo complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the merits of Lugo’s underlying claims. A footnote warned that certain future dismissals could count as strikes under the prisoner litigation statute, limiting a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees after three such strikes, subject to an exception for imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.