Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled July 6, 2023

Reinoso v. Kijakazi

Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Docket
1:23-cv-02340
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Reinoso v. Kijakazi, Judge Gorenstein reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Who this affects

Dilenia Reinoso and the Social Security Commissioner; the case was sent back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.

What happened

In Reinoso v. Kijakazi, the court entered judgment after referring to a stipulation and order dated July 6, 2023. The opinion does not explain the underlying dispute or the reasons for the stipulation.

The court reversed the Social Security Commissioner’s decision and sent the case back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Judge Gorenstein was the judge identified for the case. The judgment was dated July 6, 2023, in the Southern District of New York.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Reinoso v. Kijakazi · No. 1:23-cv-02340
Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Date
July 6, 2023

Background

Dilenia Reinoso brought this Social Security case against Kilolo Kijakazi, identified in the judgment as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. The judgment states that the court’s action was based on a stipulation and order dated July 6, 2023. The provided opinion does not describe the underlying claim or explain why the Commissioner’s decision was challenged.

Ruling

The court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the action to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A remand sends the case back to the agency for additional proceedings. The judgment cites Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993), but the provided text does not state what further proceedings are required.

Effect

The judgment returns the matter to the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings. The provided text does not state the ultimate benefits determination or any other result for Reinoso.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.