Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 7, 2023

Smith v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:22-cv-06960
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Smith v. Experian, Judge Broderick granted Experian’s unopposed motion to compel arbitration.

Who this affects

Andrew Frederick Smith and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; the caption also lists Trans Union, LLC, and Verizon Communications Inc. as defendants.

What happened

In Smith v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Experian asked the court to require arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. The case also named Trans Union, LLC, and Verizon Communications Inc. as defendants.

The court applied a standard similar to the summary-judgment standard to determine whether the parties formed a valid arbitration agreement. Because the motion was not contested, the court found no genuine factual dispute requiring further proceedings.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick granted the motion to compel arbitration and asked the Clerk of Court to close the pending motion. The opinion does not separately state a disposition for a stay of the court action.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Smith v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-06960
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
July 7, 2023

Background

Andrew Frederick Smith sued Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, and Verizon Communications Inc. Experian filed a motion asking the court to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act and to stay the court action until arbitration was completed. The motion was filed through Experian's counsel.

Issue and standard

The court explained that, when deciding a motion to compel arbitration, it applies a standard similar to the standard used for summary judgment. The court must examine the allegations relevant to whether the parties formed a valid arbitration agreement and determine whether they create a genuine dispute of material fact. When arbitrability—the question whether a dispute must be decided in arbitration—is not disputed, the court may decide the legal issue without further court proceedings.

Ruling

The court stated that Experian's motion to compel arbitration was not contested and therefore found no genuine factual issues essential to deciding whether an arbitration provision applied. Judge Vernon S. Broderick granted the motion to compel arbitration and respectfully requested that the Clerk of Court close the open motion at docket entry 30. The opinion does not separately state whether the requested stay was granted.

Disposition

Motion to compel arbitration: granted.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.