Crane v. X-Parker
- Philip Halpern
- 7:23-cv-01413
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Crane v. X-Parker, Judge Swain granted Crane 30 more days to amend his complaint and explained how to identify unknown defendants.
Michael Crane, who received additional time to file an amended complaint and instructions for referring to defendants whose names he does not know.
What happened
Michael Crane had previously received 60 days to file an amended complaint. He then asked for 30 more days and requested help identifying people he wanted to sue in Crane v. X-Parker.
The court granted the extension and said Crane must file the amended complaint within 30 days of the order. If he does not know a defendant’s name, he may use “John Doe” or “Jane Doe” in the complaint.
After receiving the amended complaint, the court said it will conduct the required screening and may ask the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision to help identify unknown defendants. Judge Swain signed the order.
The detailed version
- Crane v. X-Parker · No. 7:23-cv-01413
- Philip Halpern
- July 7, 2023
Background
Michael Crane is the plaintiff. The caption lists X-Parker, X-Nixon, and John Doe Lt. as defendants. The court had previously given Crane 60 days to file an amended complaint.
On July 6, 2023, the court received Crane’s letter dated June 30, 2023. He requested a 30-day extension to file the amended complaint and asked for the court’s assistance in identifying the names of parties he sought to sue.
Ruling
The court granted Crane’s request for an extension. It ordered him to file his amended complaint within 30 days of the order’s date.
The court explained that, if Crane does not know a defendant’s name, he may identify that person as “John Doe” or “Jane Doe” in both the caption and the body of the amended complaint. Once the amended complaint is received, the court will screen it as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). If appropriate, the court may issue a later order directing the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision to assist in identifying any John Doe defendants.
Disposition
The motion for additional time was granted. The order did not decide the merits of Crane’s claims or identify any unknown defendant. The opinion text is signed by Laura Taylor Swain, although the supplied case metadata lists Philip Halpern as the judge.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.