Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 7, 2023

Crane v. X-Parker

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:23-cv-01413
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Crane v. X-Parker, Judge Swain granted Crane 30 more days to amend his complaint and explained how to identify unknown defendants.

Who this affects

Michael Crane, who received additional time to file an amended complaint and instructions for referring to defendants whose names he does not know.

What happened

Michael Crane had previously received 60 days to file an amended complaint. He then asked for 30 more days and requested help identifying people he wanted to sue in Crane v. X-Parker.

The court granted the extension and said Crane must file the amended complaint within 30 days of the order. If he does not know a defendant’s name, he may use “John Doe” or “Jane Doe” in the complaint.

After receiving the amended complaint, the court said it will conduct the required screening and may ask the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision to help identify unknown defendants. Judge Swain signed the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Crane v. X-Parker · No. 7:23-cv-01413
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
July 7, 2023

Background

Michael Crane is the plaintiff. The caption lists X-Parker, X-Nixon, and John Doe Lt. as defendants. The court had previously given Crane 60 days to file an amended complaint.

On July 6, 2023, the court received Crane’s letter dated June 30, 2023. He requested a 30-day extension to file the amended complaint and asked for the court’s assistance in identifying the names of parties he sought to sue.

Ruling

The court granted Crane’s request for an extension. It ordered him to file his amended complaint within 30 days of the order’s date.

The court explained that, if Crane does not know a defendant’s name, he may identify that person as “John Doe” or “Jane Doe” in both the caption and the body of the amended complaint. Once the amended complaint is received, the court will screen it as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). If appropriate, the court may issue a later order directing the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision to assist in identifying any John Doe defendants.

Disposition

The motion for additional time was granted. The order did not decide the merits of Crane’s claims or identify any unknown defendant. The opinion text is signed by Laura Taylor Swain, although the supplied case metadata lists Philip Halpern as the judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.