Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 11, 2023

Swartz v. Palmetto Hospitality of Manhattan III, LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:23-cv-05762
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Swartz v. Palmetto Hospitality, Judge Rochon ordered the parties to discuss settlement, consider standing, and report whether they settled.

Who this affects

Helen Swartz and Palmetto Hospitality of Manhattan III, LLC, who must participate in the ordered settlement discussions and submit the required joint letter.

What happened

In Swartz v. Palmetto Hospitality of Manhattan III, LLC, the court ordered Helen Swartz and Palmetto Hospitality of Manhattan III, LLC to meet and confer about settling the case.

The parties must meet for at least one hour within 30 days after the summons and complaint are served. They must consider whether Swartz has satisfied the requirement of standing, meaning a sufficient connection to bring the case, but the court did not decide that issue.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon also ordered the parties to file a joint letter within 45 days of service stating whether they settled. If they did not, the letter must request mediation, a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, or an initial status conference.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Swartz v. Palmetto Hospitality of Manhattan III, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-05762
Judge
Rochon
Date
July 11, 2023

Order

The court ordered Helen Swartz and Palmetto Hospitality of Manhattan III, LLC to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. The discussions must be conducted in good faith and must address whether the parties can settle the action.

The court directed the parties to consider whether Swartz satisfied the threshold requirement of standing. Standing is the requirement that a plaintiff have the necessary connection to bring a case in federal court. The order cited two Second Circuit decisions concerning standing, but it did not decide whether Swartz has standing.

If the parties cannot settle on their own, they must also discuss whether additional settlement efforts through the court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at that time.

Required joint letter

Within 15 additional days—meaning within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint—the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must ask the court either to refer the case to mediation or to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, and state which option the parties prefer, or to proceed with an initial status conference.

Disposition and scope

This order sets settlement and case-management requirements. It does not resolve the merits of the action, decide the standing issue, or state whether either party will prevail.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.