Thompson v. Quilty
- Laura Swain
- 1:22-cv-07222
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 37
In Thompson v. Quilty, Judge Swain gave Kwaine Thompson 30 more days to amend or withdraw his civil-rights case while denying appeal fee status.
Kwaine Thompson received additional time to amend his complaint or request voluntary dismissal. The order concerned claims involving correctional staff at the George R. Vierno Center and separate arrest-related claims involving Detective James Quilty, two unnamed detectives, Gina Ransdell, and the City of New York. Claims against Assistant District Attorneys Jaile Caitlyn and Breen had been dismissed in the earlier order.
What happened
In Thompson v. Quilty, Kwaine Thompson alleged that officials and others violated his rights during his arrest, prosecution, and detention at the George R. Vierno Center on Rikers Island. He was representing himself, and the court had previously allowed him to file a second amended complaint limited to claims arising at that detention facility.
The court said it was unclear whether Thompson received the earlier order because he had been transferred between correctional facilities. The court therefore gave him an additional 30 days to file the second amended complaint. Alternatively, he could notify the court that he wanted to voluntarily dismiss this action and continue pursuing the claims in his other cases.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the merits of Thompson’s remaining detention-related claims.
The detailed version
- Thompson v. Quilty · No. 1:22-cv-07222
- Laura Swain
- July 11, 2023
Background
Kwaine Thompson brought this self-represented civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The April 12, 2023 order allowed him to file a second amended complaint asserting claims arising at the George R. Vierno Center on Rikers Island from October 8, 2021, through December 2, 2022. Those allegations included alleged sexual assaults by correctional staff and alleged retaliation after Thompson stopped participating in sexual conduct. The April order instructed him not to repeat claims being litigated in his other pending cases and warned that failure to comply could result in dismissal.
After that order was issued, the court learned that Thompson had been transferred from Elmira Correctional Facility to Mid-State Correctional Facility. The court therefore stated that it was unclear whether he had received the April order.
July 11 Order
The court granted Thompson an additional 30 days from the date of the July 11 order to file a second amended complaint. The court directed the Clerk of Court to attach the April 12 order, a second amended complaint form, and a retainer and intake form from the New York Legal Assistance Group.
The court also provided an alternative: if Thompson wanted to withdraw this action because he had previously asserted the same claims in another pending case, he could notify the court in writing within 30 days that he sought voluntary dismissal under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The order states that such a voluntary dismissal would be without prejudice to Thompson’s continuing to pursue those claims in his other actions.
Earlier rulings described in the opinion
The April 12 order dismissed all claims against Assistant District Attorneys Jaile Caitlyn and Breen because the claims sought money from defendants protected by prosecutorial immunity. It severed the claims arising from Thompson’s March 1, 2019 arrest and ongoing prosecution—including claims involving Detective James Quilty, two unnamed detectives, Gina Ransdell, and the City of New York—and directed the Clerk to open those claims as a separate action. It also granted leave to amend the claims arising at the George R. Vierno Center and denied Thompson’s request for preliminary injunctive relief. The July 11 order itself focused on giving Thompson more time to comply with the earlier amendment instructions.
Disposition
The court granted additional time to file a second amended complaint and offered voluntary dismissal as an alternative. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court did not decide the merits of Thompson’s remaining detention-related allegations.
Read the full 37-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.