Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 13, 2023

Monsoon Blockchain Storage, Inc. v. Magic Micro Co., LTD.

Judge
Clarke
Docket
1:22-cv-03114
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Monsoon Blockchain v. Magic Micro, Judge Clarke ordered additional briefing and service in a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

Monsoon Blockchain Storage, Inc. must provide additional supporting materials and serve them, while Magic Micro Co., Ltd. may file an opposition by the ordered deadline.

What happened

Monsoon Blockchain Storage, Inc. asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Magic Micro Co., Ltd. Magic Micro had not appeared or opposed the petition, and Monsoon had obtained a certificate of default.

The court ordered Monsoon to file and serve any additional supporting materials by August 10, 2023. Any opposition was due August 24, and any reply was due August 31. The court also required service of the petition, supporting papers, and the order by electronic delivery and overnight mail, followed by proof of service.

Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke issued the order on July 13, 2023. The order set briefing and service requirements but did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Monsoon Blockchain Storage, Inc. v. Magic Micro Co., LTD. · No. 1:22-cv-03114
Judge
Clarke
Date
July 13, 2023

Background

On April 24, 2023, Monsoon Blockchain Storage, Inc. filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against Magic Micro Co., Ltd. Magic Micro had not appeared or opposed the petition. Monsoon had sought and received a certificate of default.

Court’s Reasoning

The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award must be treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment. Because of that standard, the court required Monsoon to submit any additional materials supporting its petition rather than deciding the petition solely on Magic Micro’s failure to appear.

Order

The court ordered Monsoon to file and serve its additional supporting materials, such as a legal memorandum, by August 10, 2023. Magic Micro’s opposition, if any, was due August 24, 2023, and Monsoon’s reply, if any, was due August 31, 2023.

Monsoon also had to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on Magic Micro electronically and by overnight mail no later than August 10, 2023. Monsoon had to file an affidavit confirming that service by August 11, 2023.

This order set briefing and service requirements. It did not confirm or deny the arbitration award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.