Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 13, 2023

Yuan v. & Hair Lounge Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:18-cv-11905
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Yuan v. & Hair Lounge, Judge Torres granted Yuan’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs, awarding specified amounts to two law firms.

Who this affects

Dong Yuan and the two law firms receiving the fee awards—Hui Chen and Associates, PLLC, and Troy Law, PLLC—as well as the defendants affected by the amended judgment.

What happened

Dong Yuan asked the court to award attorney’s fees and costs in Yuan v. & Hair Lounge Inc. The court had received a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation on the request, and no party objected.

The court reviewed the report for clear error and found none. It adopted the report and recommendation in full and granted Yuan’s motion.

Judge Analisa Torres awarded Hui Chen and Associates, PLLC, $7,200 in fees and $400 in costs, and awarded Troy Law, PLLC, $21,925 in fees. The court said it would issue an amended judgment and directed the clerk to terminate the motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Yuan v. & Hair Lounge Inc. · No. 1:18-cv-11905
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
July 13, 2023

Background

Plaintiff Dong Yuan moved for attorney’s fees and costs. Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses issued a report and recommendation addressing that motion. The opinion states that no objections were filed.

Court’s Review

Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. Judge Torres found no clear error and adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety.

Ruling

The court granted Yuan’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs. It ordered the following awards:

- Hui Chen and Associates, PLLC: $7,200 in fees and $400 in costs. - Troy Law, PLLC: $21,925 in fees.

The court stated that it would issue an amended judgment reflecting these awards. The clerk was directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 191.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.