Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 14, 2023

DiEoreo v. Ascent Conference LLC

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:22-cv-09907
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In DiEoreo v. Ascent Conference LLC, Judge Woods approved the parties’ FLSA settlement and ordered the case closed.

Who this affects

Edward DiEoreo, Ascent Conference LLC, and the other defendants named in the caption.

What happened

DiEoreo v. Ascent Conference LLC concerns a settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing employment pay and working conditions. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or describe the underlying dispute.

At a July 14, 2023 conference, the parties presented their settlement to the court. The court reviewed it under the required standard from Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House.

Judge Gregory H. Woods approved the settlement. He said the court would endorse the parties’ agreement to voluntarily dismiss the case in a separate order, directed the clerk to terminate all pending motions, and ordered the case closed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
DiEoreo v. Ascent Conference LLC · No. 1:22-cv-09907
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
July 14, 2023

Background

Edward DiEoreo brought this action against Ascent Conference LLC and other defendants. The parties reached a settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The opinion does not state the claims’ specific allegations, the settlement amount or terms, or the parties’ positions.

Court’s Ruling

The court approved the FLSA settlement under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2016). The court stated that it would endorse the parties’ stipulation of voluntary dismissal by separate order. The clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions and close the case.

Disposition

Judge Gregory H. Woods approved the settlement and directed that the case be closed. The order itself does not state the terms of the settlement or separately enter the voluntary dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.