Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 19, 2023

Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC v. SCWORX Corporation

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:22-cv-07096
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hadrian Equities Partners v. SCWORX, Judge Rochon denied former counsel’s $69,163.98 file lien because it covered unrelated arbitration work, allowing renewal.

Who this affects

Former defense counsel Carole L. Bernstein and defendant SCWORX Corporation, whose litigation files were the subject of the requested lien.

What happened

Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC v. SCWORX Corporation concerns former defense lawyer Carole L. Bernstein’s request to keep SCWORX’s case files until she was paid. The request sought $69,163.98 in unpaid fees.

Bernstein had withdrawn after stating that SCWORX was not paying her fees. The court found that her billing records covered work in a separate private arbitration, not work in the lawsuit brought by Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC and the Phillip W. Caprio, Jr. 2007 Irrevocable Trust.

Judge Rochon denied the request for a retaining lien on SCWORX’s litigation files, but allowed Bernstein to renew it if she can support a lien based on unpaid work performed in this lawsuit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC v. SCWORX Corporation · No. 1:22-cv-07096
Judge
Rochon
Date
July 19, 2023

Background

Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC and the Phillip W. Caprio, Jr. 2007 Irrevocable Trust sued SCWORX Corporation for breach of contract. Carole L. Bernstein, who had represented SCWORX, moved to withdraw after stating, among other things, that SCWORX was not paying her fees. SCWORX did not respond to the withdrawal motion or appear as directed. On May 30, 2023, the court granted Bernstein’s motion to withdraw.

Because Bernstein was not discharged for cause, the court explained that she was entitled to payment for work performed in the case. The court also recognized a common-law “retaining lien,” which allows withdrawing counsel to keep pleadings and other client documents in counsel’s possession until the client pays amounts owed for qualifying work. The court preliminarily granted Bernstein’s request for such a lien over SCWORX’s files, but requested additional information about the amount and gave SCWORX an opportunity to respond. SCWORX did not respond by the deadline.

The Requested Lien

Bernstein sought a retaining lien of $69,163.98. Her billing records described work performed in March 2023, including reviewing text messages, preparing for cross-examination, preparing witnesses, and attending five consecutive days of a hearing. The court found that all of the requested fees came from a separate private arbitration and that Bernstein had not substantiated unpaid time related to the lawsuit before the court.

Ruling

The court held that it could set fees for work arising from the lawsuit but not for work performed in unrelated proceedings. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon therefore denied Bernstein’s request for a retaining lien related to SCWORX’s litigation files in this case, with leave to renew if Bernstein can substantiate a basis for a lien based on unpaid fees for work performed in this action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.