Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 20, 2023

Hernandez v. A.K. Rikks, Inc.

Judge
Katharine Parker
Docket
1:22-cv-07755
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Hernandez v. A.K. Rikks, Inc., Judge Parker entered a scheduling order setting amendment, discovery, and status-report deadlines.

Who this affects

The plaintiff, Janelys Hernandez, and the defendant, A.K. Rikk’s Inc., as well as their counsel, were subject to the scheduling and discovery requirements.

What happened

In Hernandez v. A.K. Rikks, Inc., the parties attended an initial case-management conference on July 20, 2023.

The court set deadlines for amending the pleadings and adding parties, completing fact and expert discovery, and filing a joint status letter. It also gave the parties instructions for handling discovery disputes and complying with the federal discovery rules.

Judge Katharine H. Parker entered the scheduling order under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hernandez v. A.K. Rikks, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-07755
Judge
Katharine Parker
Date
July 20, 2023

Background

The parties appeared for an initial case-management conference on July 20, 2023. After reviewing the pleadings and consulting with the parties, Judge Katharine H. Parker entered a scheduling order under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Scheduling and Discovery Requirements

The parties could amend the pleadings and join parties until August 19, 2023. After that date, further amendments or joinder would require good cause. The deadline for completing fact discovery was November 17, 2023, and the deadline for completing expert discovery was January 1, 2024.

The order directed the parties to follow the court’s individual procedures for discovery disputes and to comply with Rules 1 and 26(b)(1). It also reminded counsel of their duties under Rules 34 and 26(g), including discussing ways to make document requests and responses specific and avoid unnecessary disputes. The order stated that broad requests for “any and all” documents on a broad topic are presumptively improper and that an objection that does not adequately explain its grounds may be forfeited, except that the cited authority recognized an exception for privilege objections.

Status Report and Disposition

The parties were ordered to file a joint status letter by August 21, 2023, updating the court about mediation and discovery. Judge Parker entered the scheduling order; the opinion does not decide the merits of the parties’ claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.