Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 24, 2023

Neufville v. Metro Community Health Centers, Inc.

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:22-cv-06002
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
ErisaFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Neufville v. Metro Community Health Centers, Judge Carter entered default judgment awarding $40,451.09 in ERISA damages, fees, and costs.

Who this affects

Neufville received a $40,451.09 judgment against Metro Community Health Centers, Inc., consisting of back pay, interest, attorney’s fees, and costs.

What happened

In Neufville v. Metro Community Health Centers, Inc., the court had previously granted Neufville’s request for default judgment against Metro Community Health Centers, Inc. on liability for violating the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The court then required materials supporting the requested damages and gave the defendant an opportunity to explain why damages should not be awarded.

Neufville submitted materials requesting back pay, interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. Metro Community Health Centers, Inc. did not respond to the court’s order. Based on Neufville’s submissions, the court calculated the requested total as $40,451.09, correcting an earlier numerical discrepancy.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. awarded Neufville $35,040.00 in back pay, $1,829.09 in interest, $3,000.00 in attorney’s fees, and $582.00 in costs. The court ordered judgment entered in Neufville’s favor for $40,451.09 and requested that the clerk close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Neufville v. Metro Community Health Centers, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-06002
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
July 24, 2023

Background

On May 25, 2023, the court granted Neufville’s motion for default judgment against Metro Community Health Centers, Inc. as to liability on her ERISA claim. The court did not yet determine the amount of damages. It ordered Neufville to submit materials explaining the basis for the requested award and a discrepancy in the amount requested. After granting Neufville an extension, the court ordered the defendant to show cause in writing why damages should not be awarded. The defendant did not respond.

Damages Review

The court conducted an inquiry into damages using only Neufville’s affidavits and documentary submissions. It explained that a plaintiff seeking damages after a default judgment must provide enough evidence to establish the amount with reasonable certainty. A hearing was not required because damages could be determined from detailed written evidence, and neither party requested a hearing.

Neufville requested compensation for lost earnings, interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. Her affidavit stated that she had earned $73 per hour for approximately 16 hours per week and had lost approximately 30 weeks of pay after her discharge in February 2022. The court granted her request for $35,040.00 in back pay. It also granted her requests for $1,829.09 in interest, $3,000.00 in attorney’s fees under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g), and $582.00 in costs.

The court noted that Neufville’s submissions contained another calculation error. Adding the amounts awarded produced a total of $40,451.09, rather than the $40,051.19 stated in one request.

Disposition

The court ordered judgment entered in Neufville’s favor against Metro Community Health Centers, Inc. for $40,451.09 in damages, interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. The court requested that the clerk close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.