Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 24, 2023

Smith-Burrus v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-04632
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Smith-Burrus v. Commissioner: Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Smith-Burrus neither submitted a complete fee-waiver application nor paid filing fees.

Who this affects

Alfreda Smith-Burrus’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice because she did not submit the required amended fee-waiver application or pay the filing fee. The order did not decide the underlying Social Security claims.

What happened

In Smith-Burrus v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court had ordered Alfreda Smith-Burrus to submit a complete and readable application to waive filing fees or pay the required $402 filing fee within 30 days.

Smith-Burrus did neither. The court therefore dismissed her complaint without prejudice, meaning she may file a new action. The court also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal and entered judgment.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order on July 24, 2023. The dismissal was based on failure to follow the court’s filing-fee order, not on a decision about the underlying Social Security case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Smith-Burrus v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:23-cv-04632
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 24, 2023

Background

On June 20, 2023, the court directed Plaintiff Alfreda Smith-Burrus to do one of two things within 30 days: submit an amended application to proceed without paying filing fees that was fully and legibly completed, or pay the $402 required to file a civil action.

Court’s Action

Smith-Burrus did not submit an amended application and did not pay the filing fee. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice to Smith-Burrus’s refiling a new action. This disposition addressed compliance with the filing-fee requirement and did not decide the underlying Social Security claims.

The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal. The court ordered that judgment enter. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.