Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 25, 2023

Ogilvie Brands, Inc. v. Love Health, Inc.

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:23-cv-04932
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
8
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ogilvie Brands v. Love Health, Judge Rearden entered a protective order governing confidential discovery and limits on its use.

Who this affects

Ogilvie Brands, Inc. DBA Love Wellness, Love Health, Inc., their counsel and representatives, experts, consultants, vendors, witnesses, third parties producing discovery, and other persons subject to the protective order.

What happened

Ogilvie Brands, Inc. v. Love Health, Inc. is a case in which the parties, through counsel, agreed to rules protecting certain confidential information exchanged during discovery. The court found good cause to issue a tailored protective order because disclosure of some information could harm a producing person or a third party owed confidentiality.

The order allows parties to designate limited portions of discovery as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” It restricts who may receive that material and requires certain recipients to sign nondisclosure agreements. The material may be used only for this case and related appeals, and confidential designations may be challenged. The order also explains procedures for filing confidential material with the court, handling accidentally disclosed privileged material, and returning or destroying protected information after the case ends.

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden ordered the protective order on July 25, 2023. The order does not decide the underlying claims, waive objections or privileges, determine whether evidence is admissible, or guarantee that confidential material will be filed under seal. Willful violations may lead to contempt sanctions.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ogilvie Brands, Inc. v. Love Health, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-04932
Judge
Rearden
Date
July 25, 2023

Nature of the Order

The parties, through counsel, stipulated to a protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The court found good cause to enter an appropriately tailored confidentiality order for the pretrial discovery phase because discovery would involve confidential documents or information whose public disclosure could cause harm to a producing person or a third party to whom a duty of confidentiality was owed.

Confidentiality Designations

The order permits a producing person to designate only information whose disclosure is restricted by law or would harm business, commercial, financial, or personal interests. Listed categories include previously undisclosed financial information; information about ownership or control of a nonpublic company; business plans, product-development information, trade secrets, sensitive technical information, marketing plans, and other proprietary information; and personal or intimate information about an individual.

A party or third party may also designate material as “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only” when it has a good-faith belief that the material contains highly sensitive business or personal information whose disclosure is highly likely to cause significant harm. The parties acknowledged that this designation should be used sparingly and only in extraordinary circumstances.

The order sets procedures for marking documents and producing redacted copies. Deposition testimony may be designated during the deposition or within 30 days afterward by identifying specific pages, lines, or exhibits. A producing person may also correct an earlier failure to designate material before trial by notifying prior recipients in writing.

Who May Receive Protected Material

Confidential material may be disclosed to specified recipients, including the parties, insurers, counsel, litigation-support vendors, mediators or arbitrators, certain document recipients, potential witnesses, experts and consultants, deposition stenographers, and the court and its personnel. Several categories must first receive the order and sign a nondisclosure agreement.

Attorneys’-eyes-only material is subject to narrower limits. It may generally be disclosed to outside counsel for the receiving party, specified litigation-support vendors, mediators or arbitrators, certain document recipients, experts and consultants, deposition stenographers, and the court and its personnel, subject to the order’s conditions.

Protected material may be used only to prosecute or defend this action and any appeals. It may not be used for business, commercial, competitive, or other litigation purposes. The order does not restrict a person’s use of that person’s own documents or information, or information obtained independently rather than through discovery.

Challenges, Court Filings, and Privilege

A party may object to a confidentiality designation before trial by giving written notice stating the grounds. If the parties cannot promptly resolve the dispute, counsel must bring it to the court under the applicable individual rules.

The order does not create an entitlement to file confidential material under seal. A party seeking to file documents under seal must submit a letter-motion explaining the basis for sealing and must publicly file a redacted version while filing the unredacted version under seal as required. The court retains discretion over confidential treatment and states that it is unlikely to seal material introduced as evidence at trial.

If a party inadvertently discloses material subject to attorney-client privilege or attorney work-product protection, the disclosure does not waive those protections under the order. After a claim of inadvertent disclosure, the receiving party must return or destroy the material within five business days and certify that it has done so. The producing party must then provide a privilege log, while the receiving party may ask the court to compel production. The producing party retains the burden of establishing that the material is privileged or protected.

End of the Case and Enforcement

The order survives termination of the litigation. Within 30 days after final disposition, recipients must return or, with the producing person’s permission, destroy designated confidential material and certify that they have retained no copies or other reproductions. Counsel may keep archival copies of specified case materials, but those copies remain subject to the order.

The court ordered that willful violations could result in contempt of court and retained jurisdiction as necessary to enforce the order or impose contempt sanctions. Judge Rearden’s order addressed discovery confidentiality and related procedures; it did not resolve the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.