Cambridge Funding Source LLC v. Emco Oilfield Services LLC
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:22-cv-10741
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Cambridge Funding Source v. Emco Oilfield, Judge Engelmayer set deadlines for materials supporting confirmation of an arbitrator’s preliminary injunction.
Cambridge Funding Source LLC and the remaining respondents, Emco Oilfield Services LLC and Emco Alpha LLC. Several other respondents were dismissed with prejudice by stipulation before this order.
What happened
Cambridge Funding Source LLC asked the Southern District of New York to confirm a preliminary injunction issued by an arbitrator. Several respondents were voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, leaving Emco Oilfield Services LLC and Emco Alpha LLC.
Neither remaining respondent appeared or participated. The court explained that proceedings to confirm an arbitrator’s order are treated like a motion for summary judgment.
Judge Engelmayer ordered Cambridge Funding Source to file and serve any additional supporting materials by August 8, 2023. Any opposition was due August 22, and any reply was due August 29. The order did not decide whether to confirm the preliminary injunction.
The detailed version
- Cambridge Funding Source LLC v. Emco Oilfield Services LLC · No. 1:22-cv-10741
- Paul Engelmayer
- July 25, 2023
Background
Cambridge Funding Source LLC filed a petition seeking confirmation of a preliminary injunction issued by an arbitrator. On July 24, 2023, Cambridge stipulated to voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the action against several respondents. The remaining respondents were Emco Oilfield Services LLC and Emco Alpha LLC. Neither remaining respondent appeared or otherwise participated in the action.
Court’s Order
The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitrator’s award or order are treated like a motion for summary judgment. It ordered Cambridge to file and serve any additional materials supporting its petition by August 8, 2023. Any opposition from the respondents was due August 22, 2023, and any reply from Cambridge was due August 29, 2023.
What the Order Did Not Decide
The order set a schedule for further submissions; it did not grant or deny the petition to confirm the arbitrator’s preliminary injunction.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.