United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Qin
- Clarke
- 1:20-cv-10849
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Virgil Technologies LLC, Judge Clarke reassigned the case and ordered a joint status letter by August 3, 2023.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Virgil Technologies LLC, the other defendants named in the caption, and their counsel are affected by the reassignment, continuing deadlines, and joint-letter requirement.
What happened
In United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Virgil Technologies LLC, the case was reassigned to Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. The opinion does not decide the underlying dispute.
Judge Clarke kept all prior orders, dates, and deadlines in effect, but postponed any currently scheduled conference or oral argument until further order. She also required the parties to file a joint letter by August 3, 2023, describing the case, jurisdiction, deadlines, motions, appeals, discovery, settlement discussions, possible alternative dispute resolution, and trial length.
Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke ordered the parties to follow her court rules and explained how to request extensions or postponements. The opinion also said that no status letter or appearance was required if the case had already been settled or otherwise terminated and proof of termination was filed by the deadline.
The detailed version
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Qin · No. 1:20-cv-10849
- Clarke
- July 25, 2023
Nature of the Order
This is a reassignment and case-management order. It does not decide the Securities and Exchange Commission’s claims or the defendants’ defenses.
Court’s Directives
Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke stated that the case had been reassigned to her. Unless she later ordered otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines remained effective, including quarterly status reports and quarterly fee applications required by an earlier docket order. Any conference or oral argument already scheduled before the court was postponed until further order.
The court ordered the parties to file a joint letter on the electronic filing system no later than August 3, 2023. The letter could not exceed five pages, except that lengthy citizenship information for certain entities could be placed in an appendix outside the page limit. The letter had to address:
- counsel’s names and current contact information; - the nature of the case, principal defenses, and major legal and factual issues; - why federal jurisdiction and venue were proper; - all existing deadlines and cutoff dates; - previously scheduled conferences that had not occurred; - outstanding motions and the relief requested; - pending appeals; - completed and remaining discovery, including depositions; - the status of settlement discussions without exact offers or demands; - whether alternative dispute resolution would be appropriate; - the estimated trial length; and - any other information that could help move the case toward settlement or trial.
Extensions and Termination
The court stated that requests for extensions or postponements had to be made by a letter-motion filed electronically at least 48 hours before the relevant deadline or conference. The request had to provide specified information, including the original and requested new dates, prior requests, the reason for the request, and the opposing party’s position.
If the case had already been settled or otherwise terminated, counsel did not have to file the joint letter or appear, provided that a stipulation of discontinuance, voluntary dismissal, or other proof of termination was filed before the deadline.
Disposition
The court ordered the reassignment-related case-management steps described above. No merits ruling or judgment was entered. Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke signed the order on July 25, 2023.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.