Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 26, 2023

North Star IP Holdings, LLC v. Icon Trade Services LLC

Judge
Clarke
Docket
1:22-cv-07324
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In North Star IP Holdings v. Icon Trade Services, Judge Clarke reassigned the case and required a joint status letter by August 29, 2023.

Who this affects

North Star IP Holdings, LLC, Icon Trade Services LLC, and their counsel, who must comply with the reassignment, joint-letter, and case-management requirements.

What happened

North Star IP Holdings, LLC v. Icon Trade Services, LLC was reassigned to a new judge. The order says all earlier orders, dates, and deadlines remain in effect unless the court changes them.

The parties must file a joint letter by August 29, 2023. The letter must update the court on counsel, the case and its issues, jurisdiction and venue, deadlines, conferences, motions, appeals, discovery, settlement discussions, possible alternative dispute resolution, and the estimated trial length.

Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke also explained how to request extensions or adjournments and said no letter is required if the case is settled or otherwise terminated before the deadline and proof of termination is filed. The order does not decide the parties’ underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
North Star IP Holdings, LLC v. Icon Trade Services LLC · No. 1:22-cv-07324
Judge
Clarke
Date
July 26, 2023

Nature of the Order

This is a notice of reassignment and case-management order. The opinion does not resolve the parties’ underlying claims or defenses.

Reassignment and Existing Deadlines

The case was reassigned to Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. Unless the court orders otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines remain in effect, including the orders identified as Docket Entries 88 and 103. Counsel were directed to review the judge’s individual rules and practices.

Required Joint Letter

The parties must file a joint letter through the court’s electronic filing system no later than August 29, 2023. The letter may not exceed five pages, excluding any appendix needed for lengthy jurisdictional information. It must separately address:

- counsel’s names and current contact information; - the nature of the case, principal defenses, and major legal and factual issues; - why federal jurisdiction and venue are proper, including required citizenship information for entities in diversity cases; - all existing deadlines and cutoff dates; - previously scheduled conferences that have not occurred and the subjects to be discussed; - outstanding motions and the relief requested; - pending appeals; - completed and remaining discovery, including depositions and discovery needed for meaningful settlement discussions; - the status of settlement discussions without stating exact offers or demands; - whether alternative dispute resolution may be appropriate, including a settlement conference, the district’s mediation program, or a private mediator; - the estimated length of trial; and - any other information that could help move the case toward settlement or trial.

Extensions and Termination

Requests to extend a deadline or postpone a conference must be made by a letter-motion filed through the electronic filing system at least 48 hours before the deadline or conference. The request must include the original and proposed dates, information about earlier requests, the reason for the request, the opposing party’s position, and any applicable next court appearance. A scheduled conference remains on the calendar unless counsel are notified that it has been postponed.

If the case has been settled or otherwise terminated, counsel do not have to file the joint letter or appear, provided that a stipulation of discontinuance, voluntary dismissal, or other proof of termination is filed before the deadline.

Disposition

Judge Clarke ordered the parties to file the joint status letter by August 29, 2023, subject to the stated exception for a case already settled or otherwise terminated. The order is classified as a procedural order because it addresses reassignment and case administration, not the merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.