Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 31, 2023

Melendez v. Cosan Construction Corp.

Judge
Barbara Moses
Docket
1:21-cv-07426
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
EmploymentFlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Melendez v. Cosan Construction Corp., Judge Moses granted the parties’ motion and approved their revised FLSA settlement.

Who this affects

The settlement affected Hector Melendez, the other persons represented in the settlement, and the defendants, including Cosan Construction Corp.

What happened

Melendez v. Cosan Construction Corp. involved the parties’ request for approval of a revised settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties said they had removed a clause that previously prevented approval.

The parties submitted a fully signed revised settlement agreement and asked the court to approve it. After reviewing the agreement’s financial and non-financial terms, the court found that they were fair and reasonable.

Judge Moses granted the joint letter-motion and approved the proposed settlement. She ordered the parties to file their dismissal agreement by August 7, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Melendez v. Cosan Construction Corp. · No. 1:21-cv-07426
Judge
Barbara Moses
Date
July 31, 2023

Background

Hector Melendez brought the case on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated against Cosan Construction Corp. and other defendants. The parties previously submitted an agreement to settle claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, but the court did not approve it because it contained an impermissible clause restricting publicity.

Revised Settlement

In a joint letter dated July 28, 2023, the parties told the court that they had removed the no-publicity clause. They asked the court to approve their fully executed revised Settlement Agreement and Release under the standard described in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House. The court reviewed the revised agreement’s financial and non-financial terms.

Ruling

The court found that the revised agreement was fair and reasonable. It therefore granted the parties’ joint letter-motion and approved the proposed settlement. Under the revised agreement, the parties had to file their stipulation of dismissal no later than August 7, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.