Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 1, 2023

Senior v. Garmin USA Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:23-cv-05605
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Senior v. Garmin USA, Inc., Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice, but the settlement did not bind absent putative class members.

Who this affects

Frank Senior and Garmin USA, Inc. were bound by the dismissal and any settlement between them. Absent putative class members were not bound by the dismissal or settlement.

What happened

In Senior v. Garmin USA, Inc., the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the agreement's terms.

The court cancelled the scheduled conferences and deadlines and dismissed the case with prejudice, without costs or attorneys’ fees to either party. It also directed the Clerk to terminate open motions and close the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the caption changed to remove the class-action language. Because the parties had not indicated they would follow the federal class-settlement procedure, the dismissal and any settlement applied only between the individual plaintiff and Garmin and did not bind absent putative class members.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Senior v. Garmin USA Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-05605
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Aug. 1, 2023

Background

The parties notified the court on July 31, 2023, that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not provide the agreement's terms.

Court's Orders

The court cancelled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The parties could apply to reopen the case within 30 days, but the application had to show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement. The court stated that a request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause could be denied solely on that basis.

If the parties wanted the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period.

Putative Class Members

The court directed the Clerk to remove the language “individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated” from the caption. Because the parties had not notified the court that they intended to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), which governs certain class-action settlements and dismissals, the court stated that the dismissal and any settlement were operative only between Frank Senior and Garmin USA, Inc. They did not bind absent putative class members.

Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice, without costs or attorneys’ fees to either party, and directed that the case be closed. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.