Senior v. Garmin USA Inc.
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:23-cv-05605
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Senior v. Garmin USA, Inc., Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice, but the settlement did not bind absent putative class members.
Frank Senior and Garmin USA, Inc. were bound by the dismissal and any settlement between them. Absent putative class members were not bound by the dismissal or settlement.
What happened
In Senior v. Garmin USA, Inc., the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the agreement's terms.
The court cancelled the scheduled conferences and deadlines and dismissed the case with prejudice, without costs or attorneys’ fees to either party. It also directed the Clerk to terminate open motions and close the case.
Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the caption changed to remove the class-action language. Because the parties had not indicated they would follow the federal class-settlement procedure, the dismissal and any settlement applied only between the individual plaintiff and Garmin and did not bind absent putative class members.
The detailed version
- Senior v. Garmin USA Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-05605
- Valerie Caproni
- Aug. 1, 2023
Background
The parties notified the court on July 31, 2023, that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not provide the agreement's terms.
Court's Orders
The court cancelled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.
The parties could apply to reopen the case within 30 days, but the application had to show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement. The court stated that a request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause could be denied solely on that basis.
If the parties wanted the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period.
Putative Class Members
The court directed the Clerk to remove the language “individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated” from the caption. Because the parties had not notified the court that they intended to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), which governs certain class-action settlements and dismissals, the court stated that the dismissal and any settlement were operative only between Frank Senior and Garmin USA, Inc. They did not bind absent putative class members.
Disposition
Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice, without costs or attorneys’ fees to either party, and directed that the case be closed. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.