Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 1, 2023

Soto v. Annal Management Co. Ltd.

Judge
Clarke
Docket
1:23-cv-04271
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Soto v. Annal Management Co. Ltd., Judge Clarke reassigned the case, extended Defendant’s response deadline, and scheduled a remote conference.

Who this affects

Luis Raul Soto, Annal Management Co. Ltd., and counsel for all parties are affected. Annal Management Co. Ltd. received an extension until August 4, 2023, to respond to the complaint; counsel must comply with the conference and joint-letter requirements unless the case is terminated beforehand.

What happened

In Soto v. Annal Management Co. Ltd., the case was reassigned to Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. The court kept prior orders, dates, and deadlines in effect, but granted Annal Management Co. Ltd. until August 4, 2023, to respond to the complaint.

The court scheduled a remote conference for November 7, 2023, and required the parties to file a joint status letter one week beforehand unless the case was settled or otherwise terminated. The letter must address issues including the nature of the case, jurisdiction and venue, deadlines, motions, discovery, and settlement discussions.

Judge Clarke also directed the parties to consult her individual rules about a pending letter-motion and set requirements for requests to extend deadlines or adjourn the conference. The order handled case scheduling and management; it did not decide the underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Soto v. Annal Management Co. Ltd. · No. 1:23-cv-04271
Judge
Clarke
Date
Aug. 1, 2023

Background

The case was reassigned to Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke. The court stated that, unless it ordered otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines would remain in effect after reassignment.

Rulings and Case Management Requirements

The court granted Annal Management Co. Ltd.’s request, made in a July 6, 2023 letter-motion, for an extension until August 4, 2023, to respond to the complaint. The court also acknowledged receipt of the defendant’s July 25, 2023 letter-motion and directed the parties to Rule 4(k) of the court’s individual rules for further instructions.

The court ordered counsel for all parties to appear remotely by Microsoft Teams for a conference on November 7, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. Counsel must file a joint letter on the court’s electronic filing system no later than one week before the conference. The letter may not exceed five pages and must address whether an initial pretrial conference is necessary, the nature of the action and principal defenses, the important legal and factual issues, the basis for jurisdiction and venue, existing deadlines, outstanding motions, completed and needed discovery, the status of settlement discussions, and other information useful to moving the case toward settlement or trial.

If the case was settled or otherwise terminated before the conference, counsel would not need to file the joint letter or appear, provided that proof of termination was filed on the docket. The court also stated that requests for an extension or adjournment must be filed as letter-motions at least 48 hours before the relevant deadline or conference and must include specified information about the request and any prior requests.

Disposition and Significance

This was a procedural case-management order. The court granted the defendant’s request for additional time to respond and set scheduling and reporting requirements, but did not decide the merits of the lawsuit.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.